The Story Continues (5/31/12)

The Story Continues (5/29/12)

The Story Continues (5/28/12)

The Story Continues (5/27/12)

The Story Continues (5/26/12)

Babylon/Atlantis and Armaggedon in America

I've said it before: the throne of David is in England.  Jacob's prophecy about Judah reads: "Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?  The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." (Genesis 49:9-10)  I remembering listening to a pastor on the radio going over the passage from which the above quote is taken.  He totally avoided commenting on the staggering implications of what Jacob (Israel) meant when he said that Judah's scepter should endure until Jesus Christ returns.  There's simply just no other way you can read it than what it clearly says: David would always have a descendant on a throne somewhere in the world, and Christ is about to fulfill that prophecy completely.

Since it is true that a descendant of David is sitting on a throne somewhere in the world today--the question then is: where is this throne and how is it that the monarch who currently occupies said throne is descended from King David?  (It must be fathomed that in order to arrive at the truth concerning any subject or topic, you must have an open mind.  This entails that you do not readily dismiss anything you hear/read, no matter how outlandish to you it seems.  You must realize that you don't know anything at all, and you have to question everything.  One thing I know is that I don't know anything.)  To answer the above question you need to understand that the Israelite kingdom that David established was the most powerful kingdom of its day.  David built it into the empire of Israel.  David was good friends with Hiram, the king of Tyre.  Together they commanded the then world's greatest navy, whose ships reached the shores of North America.  (By the way, we are told in 1 Kings 10:14 that the weight of gold that came to Solomon (David's son) in one year was 666 talents.  Perhaps this is symbolic of Solomon already turning away from God to the gods of his pagan wives.  But it definitely foreshadows how the Antichrist will be connected to the throne of David.  And the Danites (of the Israelite empire) played a part in bringing home this gold.)  It would follow that the throne of David would be found in the nation that has been the world power in the last few centuries--especially in these last days when all things are about to be fulfilled, so that the Antichrist can ascend David's throne, claiming that he is Jesus: the Son of David.  It can't be the US because this former British colony? is not supposed to be a monarchy.  The nation wherein this throne is located is none other than the United Kingdom, from whom was birthed the United States (a masonic sanctuary).

The prophet Jeremiah took Tea Tephi, one of the two daughters of Zedekiah (the last king of Judah), to Ireland.  That was how the line of David--through Solomon--was preserved.  Scota, the other daughter, also made her way to Ireland--leading an invasion force of Milesian Greeks (related to the Athenians and of the Tribe of Judah).  (It was from Scota that Scotland got its name.)  God worked to maintain the House of David, and he did it in great, dramatic way.

Now those Khazar Jews (sons of Esau or Edom) who are Zionists/Luciferians are close to bringing about the ultimate objective of the New World Order: the Babylon kingdom (Atlantis) to be ruled over by Satan incarnate.  They know that the House of Windsor currently occupies the throne of David.  This is why England is so special to the Ashkenazi/Khazar Zionists--why the Rothschilds made their homebase in the city of London: the district known as the "City of London," where the Bank of England is housed.  It was their ancestors whom Jesus strongly criticized in the 2nd Temple--for a number of wicked practices, including the love of money: "Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!  Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?" (Matthew 23:16-17)

At first there will be a short period of peace and prosperity for the Antichrist kingdom.  But when the "man of sin" embarks upon his worldwide campaign of terror, he (the "little horn") will overthrow three horns (of the ten horns in Daniel 7, for the world has been divided into ten regions).  Other prophetic passages in scripture reveal that these three are the following (and in the order in which they will feel the Antichrist's destructive power: 1st) Egypt, 2nd) China, and 3rd) the US.  As Ezekiel 38 points out, Gog or the King of the North or the "man of sin" will get an idea into his mind--once he has subdued China (who will intervene when it perceives that its interests in Africa are threatened)--that he will now be able to launch a massive invasion of North America from both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.  Now that he possesses the Chinese army and navy, he is sure that such an endeavor can be pursued.  For the US, even in its weakened state, is still a very tall order--if you plan to invade this nation.  And at that time the people of the US (most of whom are of Israel) will have repented of their wickedness and turned to their God.  Yet the final battle will happen on American soil.  That's when the wicked (those who have not forsaken their evil ways) will be taken away or killed; the righteous will be left behind.  This is pointed out in Matthew 24: "38For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. 40Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. 41Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left." (There is no rapture.)

Lastly, this coming world war will be nuclear, involving a limited nuclear exchange between the major participants.  Ezekiel 39:9 describes how the weapons and armor of the dead soldiers in the Antichrist's invasion army (numbering in the millions) will be gathered together by the people and burned in a fire that lasts seven years.  This long lasting fire suggests it will have resulted from a limited nuclear strike on America.  And as verse 11 says, "And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the noses of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call it The valley of Hamongog." (Perhaps this valley is the "Valley of the Sun," where Phoenix, Arizona is located--being east of the Pacific Ocean.  Also, Phoenix is named for the phoenix bird: symbolic of the point in time where one age ends and another begins.)  After he annihilates Antichrist and his army, Jesus Christ will next turn his attention on the Synagogue of Satan (the Edomite Zionists).  The Son of man will kill these Edomites who've escaped the clutches of the Antichrist. (Daniel 11:41 and Isaiah 63).  Ezekiel 39:6 seems to also suggest that Christ will personally punish the Zionists ("Magog").  Then the meek shall inherit the next world to come.

The Story Continues (5/24/12) Issue #3 Begins

The Story Continues (5/22/12)

The Story Continues (5/21/12)

The Story Continues (5/18/12)

The Story Continues (5/16/12)

The Story Continues (Later on 5/14/12)

The Story Continues (5/14/12)

These two agents for a Committee member named Brandon have just encountered a "planetary angel."  C. S. Lewis--most likely a false Christian who in actuality served Lucifer--did speak of lesser truths in his fiction and non-fiction works.  If memory serves he said--in his book "Mere Christianity"--that a person has a choice: either Jesus was who he claimed to be or he was a lunatic.  Well, the truth is that Jesus was who he claimed to be.  The actual choice is: will a person turn to the truth or will they turn away to the lie: that we can become as gods.  Luciferians know the truth: that Almighty God is the True God.  And they know that his Son came from him, and by worshiping him we worship the Father. 

The Story Continues (5/12/12)

The Story Continues (5/11/12)

The Crucial First Resurrection

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.  But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished.  This is the first resurrection.  Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years." (Revelation 20:4-6)

The first resurrection is a spiritual resurrection.  It pertains to those who have been judged worthy to be with Christ Jesus once they pass from this life.  So it has to do with now--this moment!  None of us are guaranteed a tomorrow; nobody is guaranteed even two hours from now!  It's highly unlikely, but a plane could crash into my room two hours from now--killing me while I sit here at my computer.  We must decide right now if we are going to do truth--thereby coming to the light; or are we going to do evil--thereby showing that we hate the light, thus turning from it.  The decision--that determines our eternal dwelling place--needs to be made now.  I suspect that not all Christians of the past and who are living now have partaken/will partake of the first resurrection.  And I also suspect that there are some who were not/are not known as being Christians but have been resurrected the first time.  Eternity for everybody begins at this moment, now.

The thousand years is not in the future.  And the first resurrection is not a physical resurrection of the just (that happens at the beginning of this future thousand years).  Likewise the second resurrection is not a physical resurrection of the unjust only (that happens at the end of the future thousand years).  This is a wrong teaching that has permeated the church.  Its popularity apparently has to do with the rapturist/futurist/pre-millenialist model for interpreting the book of Revelation and all the other prophetic passages in scripture--by the way, an eschatological model that lends itself to Zionism.

  Now the second resurrection is a physical resurrection of everybody.  It will happen at the end of the thousand years, which is signaled by the second return of Christ Jesus to establish his kingdom here on earth literally.  Some (of those who have died or fallen asleep) will be raised to everlasting life; others (of those who have died or fallen asleep) will be raised to everlasting contempt.  The latter will be cast into "outer darkness," where they will weep and gnash their teeth--contemplating their decision to reject the True God.  The former will be the ones who took part in the first (spiritual) resurrection.  Those who are alive at Jesus' second coming--and who are also counted among the just--shall not precede those saints who have fallen asleep (in receiving their glorified bodies)--as 1 Thessalonians says.

Revelation 20:12-15 says this: "And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.  And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.  And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.  And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."  The second death is a spiritual death as well as a physical death--in the sense that the unjust shall be physically far away from Christ.  For the first death is a spiritual death: it does not denote the life breath leaving the body, a condition that we know as death: it happens in this life.  Meaning, it is how somebody ends the life that they live now.  Will they be counted among the righteous or among the unrighteous?  All will enter the kingdom of God, but the question is: will a person be close to Christ Jesus or will they be far away.  The unjust may have an opportunity to move closer to Christ, but first they must be enlightened--a process that seemingly will occur in the eternity to come. 

The first resurrection is spiritual and leads to everlasting life; whereas the first death is also spiritual and leads to "eternal damnation" (the second death).  Everlasting life is to be with Jesus Christ forever.  The second death is to be separated from God forever.  It does not mean burning in hellfire for all eternity.  The lake of fire is not a literal lake of fire.  It will be a place that is a torment of the mind: people who end up there will be thinking about why they turned away from the truth when they were in this life.  They will have resurrected (glorified) bodies like the just, but they will be far away from the presence of Jesus Christ.  Note also that hell will be thrown into the lake of fire.  For hell is a temporary holding place for sinners who did not repent and turn from their wicked ways to the truth.  Those who are in hell right now are awaiting the second death--that is they are waiting to receive their new bodies in the second resurrection (of all who've died), after which they are to be judged righteously and thrown into outer darkness.  But in the temporary place of punishment (hell) the wicked have no bodies, so they cannot feel pain in the physical sense.  The body is asleep in the grave.  The breath of life (the spirit) has returned to the Father, from whom it came.  The soul--being the union of the mind and the body--has been split, so to speak.  It appears that that part of the soul--that is one's true essence--if he or she be wicked, is put in hell or "gehenna" (a name originally referring to the valley of Hinnom, which was just outside of Jerusalem to the south, where the city's trash was thrown out).  So gehenna (hell) should be a place to be avoided after death--by showing mercy to others and doing judgment in this life. 

Luke 16 has a story about the rich man and Lazarus.  Lazarus died and went "into Abraham's bosom." (verse 22)  The rich man also died, but he ended up "in hell." (verse 23)  He speaks of being tormented in flame and learns from Abraham that there is a "great gulf" preventing Lazarus from coming over to him give him relief--by cooling the rich man's tongue with one of Lazarus' fingers dipped in water.  Thus neither can someone in hell pass over to the other side--where Lazarus is comforted.  Then the rich man asks Abraham to send Lazarus back to warn his "five brethren" who are still alive, that they might not end up in hell with him.  Abraham assures him that only hearing the prophets can his brethren save themselves from such a future; Lazarus coming back from the dead to speak with them will not convince them to repent and turn to the truth.  The rich man is conscious of his situation.  He is not, however, conscious of the world of the living.  He still believes that his brothers are alive.  They may have died also for all he knows.  As we can see in 1 Samuel 28:14-15, Saul has gotten the witch of Endor to call up the by then deceased Samuel from the underworld, but not from the same compartment that the rich man is in.  And Saul informs him that he is being severely pressured by the Philistines.  Now as for the rich man he is being tormented not by actual fire but by the metaphysical fire of a guilty conscience, if you will.

 

We can speculate about where hell is.  It may be at the very center of the earth, which is why we call it the underworld because it is literally beneath our feet but yet also in another dimension (vibrates at a frequency that we cannot perceive with our eyes)--"sheol" being another name for the underworld.  For it is likely that if you could--by way of a giant earth-drilling vehicle--burrow through the earth's crust into the inner earth (where the nephilim live), you will encounter a different dimension--a different plane of existence.  And at the very center--the central sun within the earth--is hell.  (The earth's central sun (at its core) and the sun--that the planets of our solar system revolve around--are not what they seem: one accepted as being a ball of molten metal and the other a ball of plasma.  The nature of both suns is something all together different: electric.)  So the sun at the earth's center is a place of yet another dimension different from that of the surrounding inner earth (which is different from the 3rd dimension that we inhabit here on the surface).  Hell is in the earth's central sun, where the consciousness of the wicked reside, but not physically.  It is said that crystals deep within the earth are used as containment units for the spirits of the dead nephilim.  Demons are the disembodied spirits of the nephilim who wander the earth's surface--in contrast to angels who do have bodies.  And the demons can be sent to hell, as witnessed by Mark chapter 5 where a demon named Legion (actually many demons) implores that Jesus not "torment" them.  Jesus honors their request to be sent into a herd of nearby swine, but the swine end up committing suicide by running "down a steep place into the sea..." (verse 13) 

Paul said this to the brethren in Philippi: "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.  But if I live in the flesh, this is the fruit of my labour: yet what I shall choose I wot not.  For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better..."  Here he speaks of being consciously with Jesus Christ after he dies--his body falls asleep.

King David said something revealing about the afterlife: "But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me." (2 Samuel 12:23)  David was saying that his infant first son with Bathsheba had died and that once the time comes when he too will die, he will be able to be with him: again, another verse suggesting a type of consciousness after the body enters into a state of sleep.   

          

The Beast and the False Prophet

I've speculated in previous posts about the Antichrist being a clone--made from the active blood found on the Mercy Seat that is on the Ark of the Covenant.  I would like to achieve an amount of precision as to who he is, as spoken of in the Book of Revelation. 

Alright, the Antichrist or the "man of sin" is not the first beast that is depicted in Revelation 13.  In this sense the Antichrist is not the "beast."  Notwithstanding a second "beast" comes up "out of the earth..." (Rev. 13:11)--so in this other sense the Antichrist is a beast.  

Verse 12 closes with the 2nd beast causing "the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed."  Could this mean that the Antichrist--the 2nd beast not yet fully realized and thus not yet presented to the world as its savior--causes people to worship the 1st beast?; the history-spanning beast system as finalized by Barack Obama, who was presented during the presidential campaign of 2008 as a Messiah?  The following verse (13) opens with "...he doeth great wonders..."  It appears that the pronoun "he" here refers to the person who closes out the previous verse (12)--that being the first beast.  What I'm saying is that the "he" in verse 13 (and going on into verse 14) is the first beast--again.  For it is "he" working deception through "miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed."  And so the first beast performs miracles "in the sight of" the 2nd beast (the Antichrist).  This 2nd beast is also the "image of the beast."  He is the personification of the beast system (NWO) or Babylon (that encompases commercial Babylon); the opposite of the kingdom of heaven.  But more importantly the 2nd beast is the expression of Tammuz, who was believed to be the reincarnation of his father Nimrod--and Nimrod said that he was the personification of Marduk (Satan).  Tammuz was also the son of Queen Semiramis, who styled herself as "the queen of heaven"--supposedly the foreshadowing of Mary who as a virgin gave birth to Jesus (for Genesis 3:15 prophesied of the seed of the woman).  And Tammuz suffered a "deadly wound" to the head, which was echoed by the 1st beast. (Rev. 13:2)  Thus the 2nd beast is Satan personified, and he is the son of the queen of heaven: as Jesus is the Son of God.   He is the clone of Jesus Christ, who is the "express image" of the Father. (Hebrews 1:3)

Now in Rev. 19:20 we have this: "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."  The beast in this verse is the Antichrist--the image of Nimrod=Marduk=Satan--or the 2nd beast of Rev. 13.  The "false prophet" is the 1st beast--the great world empires from Nimrod's Tower of Babel to the nearly realized New World Order under Barack Obama.  Speaking plainly, the false prophet is Barack Obama.

I can only guess as to the nature or the essence of a "human" clone.  If Prince William is the clone of Jesus--for he was born on the Summer Solstice (June 21) of 1982--then he is the Jesus of Satan.  Then it follows that this Satanic Jesus--in his development from boy to man--will replicate the life of Jesus Christ to some extent.  The date of the former's birth is important because he will turn thirty years old in June of this year: 2012, which is where the Mayan Calendar ends and which is also (synchronistically) the Year of the Dragon.  Jesus Christ apparently became aware of who he was and of his special mission on the earth around twelve years old. (Luke 2:41-47)  Maybe Prince William became aware of his future role (as the Antichrist) when he turned twelve.  Jesus Christ was baptized at thirty years old. (Luke 3:21-23)  Matthew 3:16 says of him: "...when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him."  Could it be that when Prince William turns thirty this coming June 21st, he will be fully realized as the Christ in place of Jesus Christ?--in other words, the Antichrist?  As it says of the prince of Tyrus in Ezekiel 28:2, "... and thou hast said, I am a God, I sit in the seat of God..."  Of course the Antichrist will reflect Jesus Christ (when he was here on earth).  Jesus said: "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak." (John 12:49)  Therefore the "man of sin" will speak the words that Satan directs him to because he is Satan--an imperfect reflection of the Son and his relationship to the Father.

I take it that we are now in the thousand years spoken of in Rev. 20--at the very end of it.  As the Old Testament demonstrates, the number 1,000 is never meant to be taken literally--that is never meant to mean exactly 1,000 years or 1,000 hills: "For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills." (Psalm 50:10)  So this thousand years began when Satan was bound in chains (Rev. 20:2)--meaning he was held back from furthering the reign of terror that was the slaughter of many Christians by various emperors during the days of the Roman Empire.  Satan has been prevented from being able to operate on the earth at his full capacity against the church for a long time now.  He has been chained up within the earth?  His sons (of Cain) have been working for millenia--by way of their rituals--to break his metaphysical chains.  And they are so close to doing so.  Not that the thousand years couldn't be ahead of us also: beginning with the defeat of the Antichrist in the soon approaching final battle of Armageddon--which is to take place in North America (US)--and ending with God devouring with fire the Gog and Magog army (far into the future).  Immediately after which the devil is cast into the lake of fire, "where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." (Rev. 20:10)    

     

            

The Story Continues (5/6/12)

 

Luciferianism, Zionism, Satanism and Science

This is what I comprehend (from listening to and reading what others have to say): Luciferianism is the worship of the mind, whereas Satanism is the worship of materialism.  The Illuminati are at their core Luciferians.  After all Lucifer brought light, that is he brought knowledge or illumination.  The same as Prometheus bringing fire to man after stealing it from the gods.  The serpent deceived Adam and Eve: that's clear enough when you carefully read Genesis 3.  Satan was involved in this deception because he would benefit also.  He would become the god of this world, for he ruled it before (in the days of Atlantis), during which time he engaged in commerce and amassed great wealth for his Atlantean kingdom--since he's been running the Babylon system for the last several millenia, he's acquired much wealth and money to himself.  Now it's being judged by the ten kings of the beast (under Lucifer's direction and with Satan's approval?) so as to lead to World War III, by which the NWO can be fully realized.

Science is messed up big time today.  It's claim to be objective is a joke.  It has become a religion (in the bad sense of the word).  For example, macro-evolution is the god of many scientists today.  They are dogmatic about it.  Anyone who questions their paradigm is seen as a heretic.  And athiests are similar.  To state that the gods were not actual persons but rather different psychological states is the real delusion; to not believe that the gods who came down from heaven were not real people, is to fall for Satan's trap. 

It could be that Genesis 1:2 has several layers of meaning.  It speaks of this solar system, specifically the earth as being "without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep."  This "face of the deep" was primeval.  The idea of the "Ogdoad" was developed in Egypt to explain what happened.  The Ogdoad were four pairs of primordial gods, from whom the earth and all the creatures/plants thereof arose.  Each pair was a husband and wife, and they represent the waters, darkness, invisible power, and infinity.  Toth showed up after the first mound of land appeared.  Being a primordial God--as part of the trinity that included Ra (who was over all the gods, until the followers of Osiris displaced him with their god in Egypt) and Maat--Toth is equivalent to the Word of God.  Through whom the Father spoke all created things into being.  Notwithstanding, it was the Elohim (Annunaki) whose "Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. 3And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

6And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. 8And God called the firmament Heaven."  So on one level it was the Father speaking--by way of the Son--the solar system into existence.  On another (lesser) level, it was God (the Anunnaki or lesser, anthropomorphic gods) who reconstituted the earth after the chaos of cosmic war.  As for Enki, we have the story of him slaying the Abzu (from which man came into being).  The former was part of the pantheon of younger gods; the latter was part of the higher pantheon of elder gods.  Enki (Ea being his Akkadian name) overheard a discussion between Tiamat (also an elder god) and Abzu (the deep waters beneath the earth)--in which Tiamat was trying to convince Abzu not to kill the younger gods.  The anthropomorphic younger gods were being "noisy," and it was really bothering Abzu.  So Enki acted preemptively, slaying Abzu before he could carry out his plan against the children of Anu.  The biblical passages that convey to us the rebellion of Lucifer are a distilled reflection of the Sumerian texts, thereby giving us a clearer picture--if more simple--that being what is essential. 

Which leads into this post now continuing from my last post (about the Egyptian/Sumerian cosmogonies).  Enlil, the lord of the air and brother to Enki, is somewhat enigmatic when it comes to how he relates to the Bible.  His Egyptian counterpart is Toth or Tehuti.  Enlil may be seen as Jesus Christ in his pre-incarnate state.  He may also be equated with Lucifer.  The Sumerian accounts are not entirely trustworthy.  Bibliotecaplayades.com talks about the First and Second Pyramid Wars, which occurred in the antediluvian era.  Maybe these two wars correlate with the war in which Lucifer's domination of earth was overthrown and the following war in which Satan's rule on the earth was brought to an end.  It was Marduk (before he gained the title of Satan) who destroyed Tiamat, bringing Lucifer's control over the solar system to an end.  Then Marduk's "heart was lifted up" because he was beautiful (Ezekiel 28:17).  The Great Pyramid of Giza, along with the other two pyramids (of the "Giza Complex" as Joseph Farrell puts it, comparing it to a modern military base), appears to have been some sort of fantastic weapon of great devastation.  This weapon was prized by both sides, and it may have been operated by what is called the Tablets of Destiny.  

The Sumerian account has a god named "Ninurta" as being the one tasked with bringing down the proud Marduk, which he was successful in carrying out.  Ninurta was the "son" of Enlil.  Thus this second war was between the faction of "Enkites" (led by Enki's near ideological son, Marduk) and the faction of "Enlites" (led by Enlil's "son" Ninurta).  It is said that Ninurta went up against something called "Kur"--meaning a great mountain, just like Marduk before him also overcame "Kur."  The Kur that Marduk overcame was Tiamat (which became the earth).  Then the Kur that Ninurta vanquished was Marduk or rather his fortress on the earth.  (The Enkites controlled Africa--they were mining for the orme (mono-atomic gold) in South Africa ("...land of Havilah, where there is gold; And the gold of that land is good..." (Genesis 2:11-12)--and the Enlites controlled the Levant and the Sinai Peninsula.)  Of course Ninurta led the Enlites to victory.  Is there a biblical version of Ninurta?  According to Revelation 12, it was Michael who fought with Satan.          

Both Lucifer and Satan enslaved the inhabitants of this solar system when they reigned.  God, the one whose God is the Father and who appeared on the earth as Jesus Christ, does not approve of slavery.  It was he who led the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt.  Some may quote the following statement by Jesus as proof that he endorsed the holding of slaves: "And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain." (Matthew 5:41)  Jesus is talking about standing up for the truth--standing up for what is right--and not backing down from doing truth.

Coming into the present, Satanism's ultimate expression is Zionism.  Jerusalem is to be brought to England, as William Blake said in one of his poems.  Britain is to be the prophesied fulfillment of Zion, as Luciferians and Satanists would have it.  It was right after Adam and Eve had gained knowledge of good and evil--when God conversed with Adam, Eve, and the serpent--that Lucifer planned to incarnate as a man: the Antichrist.  It was there that Lucifer and Satan learned that the Son would come into the world as a man.  Thus Lucifer and Satan decided together to manifest their own Illuminist Jesus. 

The Ashkenazi/Khazar Jewish bankers who--being the primary proponents of Zionism--run Babylon today have been squeezing the peoples of the world dry--which includes Scattered Israel of Europe: some of whom are the Celts of Spain and France, the Danites of Greece, the Romans and Etruscans of Italy, the Swedish Trojans and other Israelites scattered in Eurasia and further east.  These Khazar Jewish owned banks have been stealing from the nations through their fiat currency (debt instruments).  The money or credit that they offer is imaginary; it only becomes real once you sign your name to a homeloan (for example).  Once your signature is on that piece of paper it transforms into legal tender because your signed name is the guarantee for that supposed loan.  In actuality you are borrowing from yourself, since the money or credit "loaned" to you is based on the value of the labor you are expected to produce in your lifetime, and that's a huge amount of money.  So the banks are charging you interest (the usury that scripture speaks against) for the privelege of monetizing (withdrawing) the credit that is in your account--which is under your name in all capital letters (a corporate entity that is not really you but rather your "strawman").  These Khazar Jews who are at the pinnacle of the Illuminati pyramid (of course the very pinnacle above that is Satan himself) have the serpent's blood coursing through their veins.  And this by way of the Kenites (sons of Cain) who intermingled with the Canaanites (also including the Amalekites, who were related to Edom), who then as Edomite Jews intermingled with Khazaria--before their vicious kingdom was obliterated by the Russians in 968 AD, after which the Khazar Jewish remnant fled into Eastern Europe to become the Ashkenazi Jews.  Who took up fractional reserve banking (lending out most of other people's money and maintaining only a fraction as reserves--in other words pretending that that money was still there and intact for said people or depositors to withdraw upon demand) and the practice of usury (approved by the Talmud: perverted written commentaries on the Torah).  Fractional banking the Ashkenazi bankers learned from the Knights Templar.  All this (of which millenia-spanning plan) the Tribe of Dan--tied closely to and working jointly with the royalty of the Tribe of Judah--is in service to.  Dan is being used to judge the transgressions of Israel. 

 

The Story Continues (5/5/12)

The following page is continued from Installment #7.

Dinosaurs and Angels IV

It is accepted  by many that the dinosaurs or titans lived millions of years ago.  Can it be accepted that man lived millions of years ago also?  Could it be that there were men/women living eons ago--men/women who resembled modern mankind?   Has archaeological/anthropological evidence been found to support such an hypothesis/idea?  Have you ever seen a crop of mummy wheat?

Alas!  The answer to all of the above questions must be yes, mostly.  Joseph Farrell says that men who lived during epochs now long forgotten were not the same as "humans" today, though they looked like us.  Farrell calls them "genetic cousins."  Men living in the deep past were not the same as you and me.  There were "humans" living contemporaneously with the titans.  These "humans" were the angels, of course.  Their DNA is somewhat like ours, hence their relationship to us as "cousins."

Scripture appears to corroborate this view in chapter 6 of the Book of Genesis.  The "sons of God" or Elohim came down to the earth and took for themselves wives from among the daughters of men.  From this unsanctioned union between two genuses of men came the "giants," the "men of renown."  These guys had six fingers on each hand, six toes on each foot (and two rows of teeth, from what I've heard).  The smaller giants were about nine feet tall: Goliath was the youngest of five brothers and was also the shortest: about nine feet tall.  Not all of these heroes of old were actual giants though.

In Genesis 1, "God" made man in his image--"he" created them male and female (Genesis 1:27).  "God" here means the sons of God.  Thus the Sumerian account of the Anunnaki (the gods) coming to earth to genetically engineer man--through the combination of their own DNA with the DNA of a homonid called Homo Erectus.  For the sons of God were gods (angels).  These humans were told by "God" to "multiply, and replenish the earth..." (Gen. 1:28)  So previous humans walked the earth.  What happened to them?  Most likely they were fallen angels who had established their own civilization on the earth--but became corrupt to the point that God or Elohim was moved to destroy their civilization.  And maybe they themselves were cast into hel (Norse spelling, from which we get "hell") or sheol.

Before the fallen angels built their megalithic structures on the earth, there was an even earlier civilization: that of the Titans or Dracos (dinosaurs).  These Dracos were the original inhabitants of the earth.  The first war in the heavens was between them and the sons of God who came to take over the earth for themselves.  They were the Anunnaki (Sumerian) or the Ennead (Egyptian).  They were the children of Anu (Sumerian) or Ra (Egyptian) or YHWH (Hebrew).  Ra or Anu was/is the Creator.  He is a spirit.  He is called the "Father" in the Bible.

The leader of the Anunnaki or Elohim waging war with the dinosaurs was an individual named Enki (which may mean "Lord of the earth," according to Wikipedia), who can be equated with Lucifer--which means Light Bearer.  So Lucifer is more of a title.  He was a part of God--that is, he was part of the divine council.  Anyway, he and the sons of God under him defeated the Dracos or dinosaurs.  Something interesting is that Enki or Lucifer and the Anunaki under him were the seraphim: the fiery serpents (reptilians): the "nahash" in the original Hebrew version of the Garden in Eden story.  (Angels do not have wings, not in the organic sense.  But rather their wings materialize at will, when they need them.)  They fought against the Titans (dinosaurs), who were led by Leviathan or "the great dragon...that old serpent" (Revelation 12:9), who lived in the abyss or the deep.  The latter were killed off of course.

Lucifer brought light to the world.  Could Genesis 1:3 be saying that?:"And God said, Let there be light: and there was light."  However, Lucifer or Enki turned against the God--attempting to usurp the Creator's position as supreme God--attempting to disrupt the order that was right (righteous)--thinking now that he should be in the place of YHWH (Anu or Ra).  So he was ousted from the divine council. 

Where was Jesus in all of this?  From what I can tell, he isn't mentioned anywhere in the Cuneiform tablets.  Well, Jesus came from God, as John 16:28 says, "I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world..."  He is the image of the Father.  John calls Jesus "the Word" (John 1).  That means that the Father spoke all things into existence.  Everything created vibrates at a frequency: all created things are sound, in other words.  Many things vibrate at a frequency that we cannot see, such as beings from other dimensions.  (In his comic book mini-series "Final Crisis," Grant Morrison (ably assisted by artists J. G. Jones et al) had Superman (a cypher for Jesus) sing an "aria" in order to save the multiverse.) The Creator was not involved in the first "war in heaven."   Therefore the one we know today as Jesus did not take part in this war.  The Egyptian God named Toth or Tehuti--whose Sumerian equivalent was Abzu (fresh or spring water from deep under the earth)--bears resemblance to the Son.  Toth, along with his wife Ma'at--whose Sumerian equivalent is Tiamat (primeval salt water) and who in turn bears resemblance to the Holy Spirit--created the Ennead (the sons of God or the younger Gods.  For it says in John 1:3 that all things were created by him, and without him was not anything created--this visible, material realm--that was created.  Ma'at represents truth, and Toth is the embodiment of truth: the application of truth, which is wisdom.  It is said that Enki slew the Apsu and from the latter's clay formed man.  You can see echoes of this in the Genesis creation account, however untrue the former allegory is--and thus true the Garden in Eden story is, it being a mingling of the literal and the symbolic.       

What about Satan?  Satan means "adversary"--it is more of a title than a name.  Now Enki had a son named "Marduk."  Enki being the father of Marduk could mean that Marduk is the one whom we know as Satan today.  For Satan came into existence--in the sense that an individual (Marduk) became the adversary--after Lucifer's or Enki's rebellion.  But before he became Satan, it may have been Marduk who was the Creator's instrument for putting down Enki's rebellion: the former destroyed Tiamat, from which the earth was formed and which was ruled by Enki or Lucifer.  After the destruction that was wrought throughout our solar system--"And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep." (Genesis 1:2)  Lucifer decided to bring light into the world--light is energy is matter.  He was defeated, but he decided to create man on the earth, which had come out of Tiamat or Rahab.  The first "men"--Sasquatch, Neanderthals, maybe even Cro-magnons and others--to be his slaves.  Ra (YHWH) is spoken of as creating man from his tears and sweat.  This has to be a metaphor for the most High being affected by the plight of Adam and Eve after they sinned (each engaging in sex with the serpent--the Tree of Life symbolic of the God and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil symbolic of the other God, Satan--since the serpent was a hermaphrodite).  The Father was deeply moved by the fall of man into sinfulness; though he was not directly involved in their creation--through the Son (Yeshua or Jehovah: note the similarity) he created them--he nonetheless was grieved for their fallen condition.  Thus the prophecy in Gen. 3:15 that says that through the seed of the woman--the image of YHWH incarnated--we could be redeemed.  In this sense you could say that Jesus Christ and Lucifer (Enki) were brothers.  Both were involved in the two main creations of man: Lucifer in Gen. 1 and Jesus in Gen. 2.  Jesus is the Morning Star, and you could say that Lucifer is a Morning Star: witness what Job 38:7 says: "When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" 

Now then Marduk became filled with pride (Ezekiel 28), which resulted in him becoming Satan--and most likely made man (created by Lucifer or Enki) his slaves.  Verse 16 says, "therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub..."  (That is speaking of the future, for Satan still has access to the third heaven--where the Father dwells--as witnessed by Job 1.)  In Luke 10:18 we have this about Jesus: "And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven."  This quote sounds like Jesus was an observer.  Who was it that cast down Marduk or Satan?  Perhaps Michael?  (His name meaning "the likeness of God.)  That's why the Sumerian accounts cannot be trusted.  They don't provide us the full story.  Moses, in composing the Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament), set things right.  He was a renowned prince of Egypt and had access to the great, secluded historical/esoteric papyri--much of which was sourced from the Sumerian texts.

Enki may have created the first man, but it was the "Lord God" who made Adam and Eve (in Gen. 2).  Now it appears that we have the Creator, expressed through the Son or the Word--for YHWH is "ineffable"--getting directly involved in the creation of Adamic man.  Adam and Eve would be the final creation of man on earth--through whom the Messiah would be born--through the woman's seed that is.  (Of course it would be through the line of Seth, for Caine murdered Abel.  And Caine was the son of the serpent: a reptilian creature (possessed by Satan?).  Lucifer turns good into evil and evil into good: in the corrupted Egyptian cosmogony Osiris (Lucifer) is killed by Set (Seth).  (By the way, the antediluvian civilization in Egypt was known as "Osirian."  The first story in my comic "The Sunsaints" is a "fantasy" story that takes place in the days of this Osirian civilization in the Mediterranean.) 

What of the sons of God who came down to take wives from among the daughters of men?  They must be other members of the Anunnaki or the Ennead or the Elohim.  They are named in the Book of Enoch: "Azazel" being one name. 

What of Nibiru?  It may be a space battle-station (sort of like the Deathstar from the Starwars films and comics and novels) that is working its way back into the solar system.  Apparently, the Sumerian city of Nippur was named for Nibiru.