Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Nethinims/Children of Satan

Continuing on from the last post, let us look at 1 Chronicles 9:2: "Now the first inhabitants that dwelt in their possessions in their cities were, the Israelites, the priests, Levites, and the Nethinims."  It's interesting that the Israelites (those of Judah and Benjamin) are distinguished from a group called the Nethinims.  Now the priests and Levites are for sure Israelites--who've been called to serve in the Tabernacle. 
Going on to Ezra 2:58-59 we've got: "All the Nethinims, and the children of Solomon's servants, were three hundred ninety and two.
And these were they which went up from Telmelah, Telharsa, Cherub, Addan, and Immer: but they could not shew their father's house, and their seed, whether they were of Israel..."  This sheds further light on these Nethinims.  And a few verses further in this passage: "61And of the children of the priests: the children of Habaiah, the children of Koz, the children of Barzillai; which took a wife of the daughters of Barzillai the Gileadite, and was called after their name: 62These sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood."  What is going on here?  Well, we should always read a verse or a couple of verses in their context; thus this thing about these polluted priests must be connected to the Nethinims.

It appears that the Nethinims were Canaanites (therefore including Kenites) who'd been taken captive by the Israelites: "Also of the Nethinims, whom David and the princes had appointed for the service of the Levites, two hundred and twenty Nethinims: all of them were expressed by name." (Ezra 8:20)  They performed the more menial work of the Levites (in the Tabernacle and in the Levite dwellings too, I suppose)--and were transfered over to the more menial service of the Temple once it had been constructed (by Solomon).

Then by the time of Ezra these Nethinims (being of Kenite extraction and being deceptive like their father, Satan) had already insinuated themselves into the priestly class--and were now being found out as not being descendants of Aaron at all. 

Going back to Genesis 4 and 5 you can see a pattern: the sons of Cain were copying the sons of Seth, the former trying to make themselves appear as if they were the latter.  For Cain was the father of Enoch, who was the father of Irad, who was the father of Mehujael, who in turn was the father of Lamech.  We are told in Gen. 5 that Enoch (the seventh from Adam) was the father of Methuselah, who was the father of Lamech, who in turn was the father of Noah.  As I've shown previously, Lamech (son of Cain) was a contemporary of Noah and was alive at the time of the Sumerian flood; whereas Lamech (son of Seth and Adam) died five years before the flood happened.

Another important point is: when Cain's line is detailed in Genesis 4, nowhere is Adam mentioned.  This has to be attributed to the fact that Adam did not father Cain.  It was the serpent (back in the garden) who sired Cain.

In conclusion, the sons of Cain injected themselves into Israelite society by way of the Nethinims--and later by way of the Edomite converts to Judaism in the 2nd century BC.  By the time the Son of God arrived on the scene the sons of Cain had thoroughly infiltrated the Judean nation.

Jesus Christ was aware of this when he began his ministry in 27 AD.  In John 8:33 the Jews "answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?"  Here they are lying, since the Israelites (who were part of the Exodus under Moses) were enslaved in Egypt.  These Jews--by their own words--prove that they "are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."   

Sons of Cain (Sargon the Magnificent)/Edomites

(The above characters inspired by characters created by writer Andy Helfer--I think--Todd McFarlane's "Sam and Twitch.")
Before I start into the post proper I'd like to say something about the word "dor."  The Dorian invaders of Achaean Greece most likely came in from the forests of the north.  And then we have the forest moon of Endor, from the movie "Return of the Jedi."  Also we have the witch of Endor, who King Saul consulted: "And his servants said to him, Behold, there is a woman that hath a familiar spirit at Endor." (1 Samuel 28:7)  Why did George Lucas call that moon in his movie "Endor"?  Was he saying that witchcraft is a good thing?  It's as harmless as those cute little Ewoks, maybe he was saying?
Another thing I'd like to address before jumping into the post proper is the millenium.  I've said before that I believed that we are in the millenium now and that another millenium is in the future also.  To me now it's looking more like we're in the millenium (not literally 1,000 years), and we're approaching its end.  (Rev. 20 can still be seen as speaking of two millenia: one current and the other future, and the first resurrection is spiritual (now) and converts to the physical in the next millenium for those who are resurrected at the end of this current 1,000 years to everlasting life.  Hope that makes sense.)  Let's look first at Revelation 20:10 says: "And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever."  Apparently when the devil is thrown into the lake of fire, the beast and the false prophet are already there.  This can look like it's saying that the latter two have been in the lake of fire for a "thousand years" before the Devil is cast in there also.  Hmmm. 
Next let's look at Daniel 7:10: "I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him."  I've already established (in a previous post) that the Ancient of days is Jesus Christ, and the "one like the Son of man" who is brought before him for judgment is the Devil.  That means that the beast (the one that is the Antichrist--from Revelation 13) has already been thrown--without being judged at all--into the lake of fire (Rev. 19).  Isaiah 14: 9-10 says, "Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.  All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us?"  Satan/Lucifer will not be cast into the lake of fire immediately, without judgment (like the Antichrist, who is a clone).  The former will be judged and paraded before all the unrepentant, wicked kings who have ever ruled on the earth.  Then the Devil will be cast into the lake of fire, where the beast and the false prophet already are.
Furthermore in Revelation 6:9-11: "And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?  And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled."  The saints spoken of in this passage are the ones who were slain (beheaded as well as thrown into the Arena) in the days of the Roman Empire.  The "little season" appears to be the course of the the thousand years that we're in now.  You could say that time in heaven is different than time on earth.
     We read this in Revelation 20: "4And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. 6Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years."
All right, if the righteous--through God's Christ--are the ones who are resurrected before the beginning of this future thousand years, and if the wicked are the ones resurrected at the end of said future millenium; then why is the book of life even opened at all for the 2nd resurrection?: "12And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." (Rev. 20)
What some traditions of the world tell us is that time is cyclical.  The earth has been going through cycles (or yugas as they're called in India)--each made up of four ages: the golden, the silver, the bronze and the iron. (As man's vibration descends from the spiritual towards the material, civilization overall declines to the point of total darkness before God destroys it and starts over, thus indicating that the new cycle we're entering into may eventually see the horrific rise of the serpent a "thousand years" from now that God will then crush: going on and on into infinity.)  The Bible itself portrays a cycle, for it pretty much begins with the Garden in Eden (paradise), wherein was the Tree of Life; and it ends with that same Tree in Revelation.
Now for the post proper.  Straightening out this confused matter of the Jews requires some detective work.  From where do the Ashkenazi Jews come from?  You can trace them back to Khazaria in the 8th century AD.  This was before they were dispersed (into Eastern Europe and taking up the name "Ashkenazi") by the young Russian state in the 10th century AD.  Therefore it was in the 700s AD that Edomite Jews from Babylon came among the Khazars to teach them Judaism.  Before Babylon these Edomite Jews had lived in Jerusalem--until 70 AD when a Roman army under Prince Titus overran the city--thus fulfilling the second part of Daniel 9:27: "...and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."  God, by way of the Romans, made Jerusalem "desolate."
What I really want to examine more in this post is how the Edomites became "Jews" in the first place.  We can begin with the Maccabean Revolt.  In 166 BC Judas Maccabee successfully led a Jewish partisan army in driving the Seleucid army from Jerusalem.  Once more Judah was an autonomous state--since its conquest by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.
In 112 BC John Hyrcanus, a Maccabean king, conquered Edom and forced the inhabitants to convert to Judaism (including circumcision).  These Edomite or "Idumean" Jews became a part of Judahite society from that time on.
But even before that we have something peculiar being spoken of in the Old Testament.  Genesis 15:19-21 says, "The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites."  These were peoples whose lands were promised to Abraham.  The Kenites (Cainites) are listed at the beginning.  Apparently after the flood of Sumeria, the sons of Cain came in to mix with the inhabitants of Canaan (who had mixed with fallen angels to produce more Nephilim).  And Cain was fathered by the serpent (Satan).
Later on in Genesis 36:2 we are told that "Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite..."  And Esau was the father of the Edomites, for verse 1 of Genesis 36 tells us: "Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom."  Thus the seed of the serpent became part of the Edomites by way of the Canaanites. 

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Artistic Apocalypse

Even this late in the late hour I still take some time to appreciate great art.  Above is a page from a comic drawn and colored by Mark Badger.  It's brilliant and shows Badger to be a master cartoonist.  Now look at a piece of illustration (just below) that I did.
Isn't my illo comparable to Badger's drawing?  Wouldn't that make me a master artist also?  Check out another comic page by the superb Mark Badger.
Amazing stuff.  Now check out another drawing by yours truly that I'm sure is of the same caliber.
 Please do not judge me as being arrogant when I'm pretty much saying that I'm a master of drawing and painting like Mark Badger.  I can attest to having a sobering mind.  You know you've arrived (as an artist) when you can honestly say that your own art is at the level of accomplishment that Badger has achieved.


Thursday, September 20, 2012

Apocalypse: Neal Adams Apple Garden

In Matthew 24 Jesus speaks about watching for signs that point to the revealing or apocalypse.  In verse 15, Jesus says, "When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains..."  The Son of man is referring to what Daniel says: "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate." (chapter 9, verse 27) 

It should be noted that Jesus does not say anything about a covenant being confirmed for a week (of years).  Plainly, he does not say anything about a seven-year peace treaty.  Note also that "the overspreading of abominations" is separate from the seven-year confirmation: said overspreading happening after said confirmation.  The "abomination of desolation" that Jesus warns about is not something that occurs in a moment.  It occurs--rather it occurred--over a period of years.  For Jesus was warning about the increasing wickedness of the "generation of vipers" (Matthew 12:34): the scribes and Pharisees, this group that had been coopted by the Kenites (sons of Cain who had joined themselves to the Edomites).  The wickedness in Jerusalem would grow so great that God would have the Romans (under Prince Titus) lay siege to the Chosen City for three and a half years before it would finally fall to slaughter and destruction in 70 AD.  The Son of man is saying that people living in Jerusalem in the time immediately preceding the Roman siege--which would be brought about by God because the city's leaders rejected Jesus during his ministry and because of the "overspreading of abominations" in the 2nd Temple as well as the rest of the city--should run for it when they would see the Roman movement against Jerusalem about to come to pass.  (The corruption all around growing worse and worse, like today.)  Many of the inhabitants of Jerusalem would not heed Jesus' warning and so would be caught in the siege and die.

If Jesus is speaking (primarily) of a future appearance (by the Antichrist) in a future, rebuilt Temple--then that's not much of a warning (seems to me).  There won't be enough time to flee.  Besides if Jesus is implying a future seven-year treaty, then his servants will know that the beginning of such a treaty is when to prepare for what is coming.  More importantly, in Zechariah 12 we are told that when the "son of perdition" does come into Jerusalem--he will be driven out of that city supernaturally: that is only God can do so.  Witness the following: "6In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem. 7The LORD also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah. 8In that day shall the LORD defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the LORD before them."  The Sephardic Jews or Judeans living in Jerusalem--at the time the Antichrist (or "the Assyrian" from "the land of Nimrod" or the land of Sargon, a foreshadowing of the "man of sin" (Micah 5:5-6)) invades the Glorious Land--will be strengthened by God.  (The "evil figs" of Jeremiah 24--those Judeans who rejected their God--will have no part in this wonderful thing of God moving with a stretched out arm for the "good figs:" the Judeans who will turn to Jesus once more.)  These Judeans will not have to flee.  And "coincidentally" the (Zionist) Edomites living in the land will also escape from being killed by the image of the beast (Antichrist), as confirmed by Daniel 11:41--"He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon."--and also confirmed by Isaiah 63.

Furthermore verse 9 of Zechariah 12 is intriguing: "And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem."  Carefully note that God is saying that he "will seek" to smash the international army that comes up against the Holy City.  Meaning, the Lord will not destroy them then and there; he will destroy them later: after they invade North America from both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (as Ezekiel 38 attests)--once they are gathered in the Valley of the Sun (City of Phoenix: a symbol used in the closing ceremony of the London Olympics) in the State of Arizona--this last part I've theorized before.

What does support a future (well, that most likely is upon us now) seven-year long period of the Antichrist kingdom is this: The saints "shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time." (Daniel 7:25)

Alright, next item.  The creation of Adam and Eve (garden in Eden) happened around 47,000 BC.  I've maintained that the serpent's seed (sons of Cain) are separate from the offspring of the sons of God (who are not the same as the Anunnaki of Genesis 1) and the daughters of men in Genesis 6.  The Book of Enoch states that these sons of God (angels who left their first estate: Book of Jude) would be forced to watch their unnatural Nephilim offspring be killed and then they would be imprisoned within the earth for 70 generations, until the day of judgment.  I don't reccomend reading the Book of Enoch.  It may have historical truth, but it was not inspired by the Holy Spirit.  Now Lamech (son of Cain) was alive at the time that God's judgment came upon Sumeria because of what the sons of God had done (and the overall great increase in violence and evil in general); for this Lamech was named for the Lamech (son of Seth) who fathered Noah.  Lamech (son of Cain) was living in Nod--to the east of Sumeria (where the garden had been).  His namesake was the other Lamech (son of Seth) who was born before him.  (Cain's line was copying Seth's line.)

Now if we accept that the end of this period of 70 generations is between 2012 and 2019 (the short time that Satan has left to attempt to consolidate his kingdom on the earth: Revelation 12)--and if we accept that Noah's flood took place around 5000 BC (as I've covered in a previous post); then we have around 7,000 years.  A generation of the Nephilim is about 700 years.  Look at what Genesis 5:31 says concerning Lamech son of Seth: "And all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years: and he died."  He died five years before God brought about the flood.  Note what Lamech (son of Cain) says in Genesis 4:24: "If Cain shall be avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy and sevenfold."  Apparently he was aware of the pronouncement against the group of angels who'd left their first estate (to come down to take wives from among the daughters of men).  Having established that 70 generations = 7,000 years, we take 7,000 years and multiply by 7 (the "seventy and sevenfold," substituting 7,000 for the 70 generations).  The result of this multiplication is 49,000 (years ago), when Adam and Eve were created.  Anthropology has discovered that mankind began to spread over the earth about 50,000 BC (after a massive reduction in the human population from catastrophes earlier).  There may be a correlation.  (Atlantis suffered a major destruction around 50,000 BC.)

The following may be an esoterical proof for this theory.  Adding together the digits in Genesis 4:24 we get 10 (mathmatically speaking, we have 4+2+4).  And from Adam to Noah we have ten generations (before Noah's flood).  Thus Lamech son of Cain can be seen as being contemporary with Noah and therefore the regional flood (of antediluvian Sumeria).

Onto the next item.  Comic book writer/artist Neal Adams is a proponent of the expanding earth.  From what I can see, he's right on.  All the continents fit together neatly.  They were all once (very long ago) one continent, when the earth was smaller.  As the earth expanded, this one continent--called Pangaea by some--broke apart.

(And speaking of the garden, I've heard that the shares of Apple Computers are at an all-time high.  Could this be the Illuminati telegraphing to the people that they are about to carry out the next stage of mankind (in their eyes)?: godhood: the lie that the serpent tempted Eve with?  Apples being symbolic of Luciferic enlightenment.  This involves the mark of the beast, which has to do with a mark on the hand or on the forehead: opening the third eye, which leads to the Illuminists deceiving and manipulating people.)

Last item for this post.  I've also just heard that both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are tied in the polls: Obama received 47% support and Romney received 47% support.  We can add all the digits together: 4+7=11 and 4+7=11: we hav 11+11=22 for the 22 chapters in Revelation: and 2+2=4.  The number four represents the spirit realm; as I've said in the previous post, time cannot be said to be the 4th dimension.  The 4th dimension has to be at a right angle to the 3rd dimension, since all 3 dimensions (of this material realm that we inhabit) are at right angles to each other in space.  I guess that's why I said that a fourth dimensional creature can see all the sides of the imaginary cube that's floating there.  What I'm getting at is that the cabalists--they're not the powers that be; only those who stand up for what is right and good are--are telling everybody what is about to happen soon: the spirit realm is about to invade this physical plane in a massive way.  Of course this will end with the return of Jesus Christ to annihilate his enemies (2 Thessalonians 2 and Isaiah 63) and to establish his government on the earth.  We have in Isaiah 9:6: "and the government shall be upon his shoulder..."


Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Brahman from Abraham, 4-D and "Take heed..."

The Hindu trinity is interesting.  Apparently it consists of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva.  Brahma is the creator.  Note how his name is almost an anagram of "Abraham."  Something is going on here.  Hinduism is a religion that began to take shape in the AD era.  And Abraham was alive circa the twentieth century BC.  He was a major figure in his day.  He went to war with kings and overcame them.  He was quite wealthy.  Most importantly he answered the call of the True God.  It is conceivable that his legend would reach India.  Abraham would become the father of many nations.  All this is in Genesis.
The Hindus have an understanding of the God, though it's not anywhere near as clear as the word of God.  On the other hand the history that is presented in the Rig Veda and other poems of India are fact.  Rama's Bridge is real.  The Rama Empire was real (dating to before 9600 BC--the sinking of Atlantis).  Rama fought a war with Atlantis.  Krishna was a real person.  And his city, Dwarka, lies underwater off the west coast of India (having been inundated about 1500 BC).     
Before I get into the post proper I'd like to discuss the 4th dimension.  Time--as we understand it--is not the 4th dimension, as I see it.  God did not create time.  This time that we (our physical bodies)are subject to came about because of sin--the sin of rejecting God and thinking that we don't need God--that we are gods and that we are supreme.  The tendency for everything in this universe to entropy (Living physical creatures die.) is a consequence of sin, and the progression of entropy is measured by time.  (The lake of fire speaks of spiritual death or being in the outer darkness.)
I would say that there are different kinds of time.  There was a time (in this solar system and specifically on this earth) when physical death was not a reality.  And then you have time travel--both forward into the future and going back into the past.  The reality of time travel brings into consideration the existence of multiple timelines. 
Thus a fourth dimensional creature can inhabit the same space as a 3-D creature but be viewing the latter from above, if you will.  Demons are disembodied nephilim--who are unnatural in the first place--who feel the need to inhabit or possess unsaved people (and animals too).  These demons appear to strongly dislike being homeless, if you will.  They have the urge to find a physical dwelling, so they seek men and women whom they can possess.  They are not like the fallen angels, who possess their own spirit bodies and have no need to take possession of living physical bodies. 
That is the 4th dimension, of which (you can say) time as we know it, is an aspect.  For argument's sake let's say we can see a floating cube in front of us; but we can't fully perceive it.  That is we cannot see all six sides of it at once.  A 4-D creature can do that.
Lastly, Jesus says in Luke 8:18, "Take heed therefore how ye hear: for whosoever hath, to him shall be given; and whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken even that which he seemeth to have."  To me the Zionist "Christians" have not taken heed concerning what they have chosen to believe and not to believe concerning the matter of the Jews and of Israel also.  The State of Israel is not Israel.  Yes, there are Sephardic Jews living in Palestine; but they are a minority in the Israeli state.  And the Sephardic Jews are part of Israel--being of the Tribe of Judah.  Israel, for the most part, has been scattered.  The two greatest tribes--Ephraim and Manasseh--are England and the USA today, respectively.  I've discussed this in previous posts and won't get in-depth here. 
What the Zionists seem to have--knowledge and wisdom (enlightenment)--they will have no more.  And this is shown by those who do not claim to be Christians, knowing the truth about Zionism.  The Zionist teachers in the church--serving the synagogue of Satan--are now close to bringing about the fruition of their efforts: World War III.
When the "man of sin" arises, some (Edomite) Zionists--the Rothschilds--will worship him; many Edomites, seemingly, will not.  The Antichrist will try to kill them, but they will escape out of his hands (Daniel 11).  Isaiah, speaking poetically and metaphorically in chapter 63 of his book (verses 1 and 4), speaks of someone coming "from Edom."  This is Jesus Christ of Nazareth approaching and he says, "I have trodden the winepress alone; and of the people there was none with me: for I will tread them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury; and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment.
For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and the year of my redeemed is come. " 

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Reuben, Gad, and Half Manasseh=Celts

Before I discuss France being the land of the tribe of Reuben today, I would like to show further how Atum-Re is another name for Jesus Christ.  1 Corinthians 15:45 says, "And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit."  In the previous post I said that Atum=Adam (and from which we get "atom" also, I'm sure).  The "last Adam" is Jesus Christ; thus Atum-Re is Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
I would like to dispel the idea of the Jews being Israel; I would also like to dispel the idea of spiritual Israel.
Now 1 Chronicles 5 speaks of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh--the tribes that dwelt on the east side of the Jordan River.  We have this about the eastern tribes: "18The sons of Reuben, and the Gadites, and half the tribe of Manasseh, of valiant men, men able to bear buckler and sword, and to shoot with bow, and skilful in war, were four and forty thousand seven hundred and threescore, that went out to the war. 19And they made war with the Hagarites, with Jetur, and Nephish, and Nodab. 20And they were helped against them, and the Hagarites were delivered into their hand, and all that were with them: for they cried to God in the battle, and he was intreated of them; because they put their trust in him."  Because of the Lord God of hosts they were doing well--for a time.
But later these tribes turned from the True God: "25And they transgressed against the God of their fathers, and went a whoring after the gods of the people of the land, whom God destroyed before them. 26And the God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Pul king of Assyria, and the spirit of Tilgathpilneser king of Assyria, and he carried them away, even the Reubenites, and the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh, and brought them unto Halah, and Habor, and Hara, and to the river Gozan, unto this day."  This happened early in the period of deportations (732 BC).  As you can see by the map below that there were two main areas of exile for the Northern Kingdom of Israel and most of the Southern Kingdom of Judah.  2 Kings 15:29 tells us, "In the days of Pekah king of Israel came Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, and took Ijon, and Abelbethmaachah, and Janoah, and Kedesh, and Hazor, and Gilead, and Galilee, all the land of Naphtali, and carried them captive to Assyria."  These were most likely placed in Gozan (4, U-V) with the tribes that were east of the Jordan.      
(map courtesy of Celtica)
The complete deportation of the tribes of the Northern Kingdom was completed in 722 BC (but most likely took longer to complete).  Witness 2 Kings 18:11: "And the king of Assyria did carry away Israel unto Assyria, and put them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes."
The dominant tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh were placed in the "cities of the Medes."  For it would be the tribes placed in this area that would go on to become the Anglo-Saxons (the British Empire and the United States of America).  Note this promise by God to Jacob: "And God said unto him, I am God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins."  The Israelites in the area of the Medes (Y, 5) went on to become the Scythians (a major tribe of whom was the Massagetae) and the Parthians.  And it was the Parthians--once they were driven from Persia by an uprising of the natives whom they had subjugated for a few centuries--who would go on to become the Saxons.
Lastly, the deportation of most of the Southern Kingdom was carried out from 704 BC to 681 BC.  A major banishment of Judahites occurred in 701 BC, as 2 Kings 18:13 says, "Now in the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah did Sennacherib king of Assyria come up against all the fenced cities of Judah, and took them."  These Judahites were put in Gozan, which was already occupied by Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh (and some of the other tribes), who had become numerous in that area.  When these Judahites were brought in to join their Hebrew brethren, the latter--deciding that the land had now become too crowded--emmigrated westward (around 700 BC).
These Hebrew brethren had taken on the name of "Gamira," which grew out of Beth Khumri (House of Omri, who was a king of the Northern Kingdom).  The Gamira--made up of Reuben, Gad, Manasseh and some of the other tribes--moved into Turkey and crossed the Bosporus Strait into Thrace (the Balkans today).  These Gamira became the Cimmerians, whom the ancient Greeks (also Israelites) called the "Keltoi"--from which came "Celts."
Now a good portion of these Celts settled in the land known as France today (being the Reubenites).  Scripture reveals something about Reuben: "And it came to pass, when Israel dwelt in that land, that Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father's concubine" (Genesis 35:22).  Apparently the French people are obsessed (relatively speaking) with sex.  I've seen enough French comic books (band-desinee) to get that impression.  The French people (tribe of Reuben) have their father's preoccupation with lasciviousness, generally speaking. 
Reuben was the eldest son of Jacob, but because of his transgression against his father Israel and (most importantly) against God--he did not receive the birthright: "Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he was the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel" (1 Chronicles 5:1). So that's why Ephraim (Britain and the British Commonwealth) and Manasseh (USA) became the great powers of the last centuries--and not France.  France has felt that it should be the leading nation of the West, but the birthright is not theirs.
 Another thing is that half of the tribe of Manasseh was part of the Cimmerian immigration into France.  I'm confident that those Celts (who were of that half of Manasseh that once dwelt west of the Jordan River) became united with the other half of Manasseh in North America.  For we have the French of Quebec and the Cajuns of Louisiana--including Americans who have French last names.
New Orleans is known for its annual gay pride parade--along with Mardi Gras.  This flaunting of sexual sin--including sodomy--is getting to the point where God will do something about it.  Working through the Luciferian beast system--which employs HAARP (most likely on the three sink holes that are next to a large deposit of butane, besides the huge salt deposit under that area that has less pressure than the land above)--Louisiana will be engulfed by the Gulf.  God is long-suffering, but he will not strive with man forever.  We are told in 2 Kings 23:7 that the righteous King Josiah "brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove."  There is but a short time left for the inhabitants of New Orleans to repent and turn to their Creator.   

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Sargon, Ausar, Atum, and Amun

 Before I get into the subject of this post, I would like to give another verse concerning the New Covenant.  Here is Jeremiah 31:31: "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah."  Note how Jeremiah distinguishes between the House of Israel and the House of Judah.  The House of Israel became most of Scattered Israel (mainly in Europe).  Paul undertook Gospel preaching journeys to as far as Britain (though that is not recorded in the scriptures).
Before I go on further I would like to address (in a nutshell) the grand history of this solar system (in terms of the sons of God or Elohim or Anunnaki: those whom Anu sent from heaven to earth).  The first inhabitants of the earth were the dinosaurs or titans.  They had an advanced civilization.  "Leviathan" in the Bible refers to the ruler of this civilization, who at some time (in the way distant past) rebelled against the most High.  God sent in Lucifer (or Enki or Osiris) to put down this rebellion.  Lucifer and his angels--whom God had placed under his command--then took over this solar system.  In time Lucifer and his angels (being a third of all the angels) rebelled, and Marduk (or Horus or Satan) was sent in with an army to crush this 2nd rebellion.  The latter was successful in this endeavor and proceeded to establish his rulership (or governoship) of this solar system.  It was Marduk who blew up Tiamat--the planet between Mars and Jupiter--from which a large section flew off to eventually settle into orbit between Venus and Mars to become earth.  It was also Marduk who established Atlantis, the founding of which civilization is credited to Poseidon.  And in time Marduk (Horus) also rebelled, becoming Satan.  Then God sent in Ninurta (the archangel Michael) with an army to smash this third rebellion (
One more thing I'll touch on before going onto the subject of this post.  A passage from Daniel 7 is speaking of Jesus Christ at the end of time judging Satan: "9I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
10A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.  11I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame. 12As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.  13I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him."  Like many Christians, I made the mistake of thinking that the Ancient of days--with pure wool-like hair--is the Father; but the Father has no form--that is he has no (spirit) body, as his spiritual and physical creatures do.  The Ancient of days is none other than Jesus Christ.  Note how at the beginning of this passage it mentions that earthly thrones are cast down, making way for Christ to establish his throne.   Witness Revelation 1:14: "His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire."  Clearly the individual described in the above passage from Daniel 7 and the individual described in Rev. 1 are one and the same.   Further, we have an explanation of the above passage further on in Daniel 7: "26But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. 27And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him."  The "they" in verse 26 most likely is speaking of Jesus Christ and his servants under him--and Christ is under the most High.
Finally, the subject of this post.  I believe that Nimrod of the Bible and Sargon of mainstream ancient history are one and the same person.  We've been told that Sargon was a Semitic ruler who founded the city of Akkad--anywhere between 3800 BC to 2300 BC.  And Sargon is (supposed) to be the first great conqueror in the Near East.  The Bible tells us that Nimrod "began to be a mighty one" and that he was the founder of the cities of Babel and Accad (Genesis 10:8-10).  It was he who commanded that the Tower of Babel be built (Gen. 11). 
It looks to me that Nimrod rewrote his own biography.  The word of God tells us that Nimrod was a grandson of Ham (Gen. 10:6-8).  Nimrod took on the title of "Sargon"--meaning "true king"--and changed his parentage from his grandfather Ham to Ham's brother Shem.  Why would he do this?  The answer appears to be provided in Genesis 9:25-27, where Noah pronounces a curse and blessings: "And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.  And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.  God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant."  Nimrod knew that his great grandfather Noah had blessed his grand uncle Shem; whereas Ham received no blessing, but his son Canaan received a curse.  It may very well be that Nimrod or Sargon wanted to distance himself from his blood connection to Ham.  Once he gained power over the institutions, Nimrod had his followers obliterate any record of his being of Ham's lineage.  And he had new records made, showing that he was of Shem's lineage--thereby justifying his kingship, for Shem received the greater blessing between him and his other brother Japheth.
There was a pre-flood Sargon, who was Cain the elder son of Adam.  He had the title of "Sargon the Magnificent."  He was the first Sargon and Nimrod was the 2nd Sargon.
Now the title "ashar" is quite old. "Ashar" appears to have derived from the name "Osiris." Or it may be the other way around. From Osiris also comes "Asherah," "Ausar," and "Asshur." "Ashar" may mean something like this: "original truth."  Osiris appears to be the Egyptian name for Lucifer. And "Lucifer" itself is a title meaning "light bearer."

While we're at it, "Atum" must have come from "Adam." And we have the Egyptian God "Atum-Re" (pronounced "Ray").  Now Adam is called "the son of God" (Luke 3:38). And Jesus is the Son of God. Then it may be said that Atum-Re (Re being another version of Ra)--who was worshiped in Heliopolis--points to Jesus Christ.

"Amun" is related to "amen." Revelation 3:14 says this: "These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God." Amun held up Ma'at--who was identifed with truth, justice, and goodness. Thus Amun or amen must have to do with truth and all that is good. "Amun-Ra" was the ultimate God of early ancient Egypt. He most likely is equivalent to the Christ Jesus or the Father or both. "Ra" (another God) means light, and in the epistle of James (1:17) we are told that "Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights..."

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Confirmation Lasts 7 Years 2

What we have is sort of parallelism: The first two clauses in Daniel 9:27 are a continuation of the first clause in the previous verse (Dan. 9:26).  And the third (last) clause in Daniel 9:27 is a continuation of the last two clauses in Daniel 9:26. 
The first part of Dan. 9:26 says, "And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself."  This undoubtedly is talking about Jesus Christ.  The rest of this verse says, ": and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."  I don't think anybody would argue with these last two clauses (of verse 26) being about Prince Titus.  History bears this out.
Going on to Dan. 9:27 we have, "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease."  The pronoun "he" does not refer to the nearest noun antecedent; "he" refers to the nearest noun antecedent that is the subject of a clause.  In other words the pronoun "he" does not refer to "the prince" from the previous verse; rather it refers back to "Messiah" from the previous verse.  That's because "the prince" is not the subject of the clause it is in; "the prince" is a modifier: a descriptive that tells us to whom "the people" belong.  The soldiers of Prince Titus stormed Jerusalem in 70 AD, after some three and a half years of laying siege to it.  These soldiers destroyed the Chosen City and also razed the Temple, which they were commanded by Titus to not tear down.  In their work of slaughter and destruction the Roman soldiers got carried away--employing fire in their endeavor to level the Temple.  Afterwards, the gold (which Titus was after) had melted and became stuck between the jumbled mass of stone bricks as it cooled.  Titus ordered his men to extract the gold from the Temple ruins.  Now you can see that it was "the people" who pillaged Jerusalem.  And the descriptive "the prince" tells us whom these soldiers served.
We must then conclude that "he" in Dan. 9:27 is speaking of the Christ.  He confirmed (the confirmation lasting 7 years) the New Covenant "with many."  The "many" is referring to scattered Israel--most of whom were in Europe.  That's why this confirmation ended in 34 AD (having begun in 27 AD).  For Jesus confronted Saul when the latter was on his way to Damascus to arrest Christians.  Saul became a servant of Christ Jesus from then onwards.  God gave Saul--who became Paul--the mission of taking the Gospel to the Israelites of Europe: as John 10:16 says,"And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd."  Paul had a great part in helping to begin the fulfillment of those words of Jesus, which were also were prophesied in Jeremiah 37--that the scattered Northern Kingdom of Israel would be reunited with the Judahites (Sephardic Jews).  And those Israelites--who sailed away from Egypt before the Exodus under Moses and thus becoming the Achaean Greeks and the Trojans--would also be reunited with the rest of Israel.  Christianity spreading throughout Europe is what is meant by "he" confirming the [new] covenant with "many."