The Story Continues (11/22/12)

 

It may be that when Francis Bacon and his friends shaped the English language--the King James Version of the Bible--that came down to us, Bacon simultaneously transmitting the truth to us from the original languages (Hebrew and Greek) and also obfuscating at the same time.  The English language is equivocal.  There are many words that have multiple meanings.  The word "love" has different shades of meaning, unlike in the Greek where you have different words for the specific kinds of love: agape being the greatest form of love, which only God can express.  And especially today people are turned off from reading the KJV Bible because the language is too archaic, in their eyes.

 

Bacon, being an occultist, knew that Satan attempts to counterfeit God.  (Therefore Satan is obligated to tell people what he intends to do before he does it.)  This is how God operates, as Amos 3:7 says, "Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets."  And so Bacon was compelled to transmit the truth via the Authorized Version of the Bible, but he--since he was a servant of Satan--sought to make the truth difficult to grasp.  For example, Zionism is of the antichrist spirit.  Yet many "Christians" today--especially those in the USA--are Zionist "Christians."  This sad state of affairs is not wholly the result of the (seeming) obliqueness of the Authorized Version or the KJV.  The wicked ones foisting on the people all these other modern (corrupt) Bible versions have also played a major role in the great deception and apostasy--such as the NIV, the Message, etc.  

 

Going back to the equivocality thing what really makes the equivocalness of the English language drive one to exasperation can be: how the word "repent" is used in the Bible, concerning God himself.  Genesis 6:6 says, "And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."  Yet in Deuteronomy 23:19 we have: "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"  Perhaps this was done to confuse people?  Certainly in Gen. 6:6 the LORD is not actually repenting of his creation of man.  After all, the Father sent his only begotten Son to be born as a man.  "45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven." (1 Corinthians 15) 

 

 

 

The Story Continues (11/20/12)

 

These days the attack against the the Apostle Paul is stronger than ever (part of the "falling away" that he spoke of).  One way people discredit him is with the two recountings--in the Book of Acts--of his conversion experience on the road to Damascus.  Acts 9:7 says, "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."  In Acts 22:9 we have: "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."  An apparent contradiction?  Not really.  In the first verse "voice" means that Saul's (Paul) companions heard the voice of an unseen man but could not discern the words of said man--as the second verse indicates.

 

We see that Genesis 3:8 says, "And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden."  Here "voice" must mean the sound that the LORD God was making as he made his way through the garden.  For the next verse (9) tells us, "And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?"  Clearly the Creator did not speak until Genesis 3:9.

 

The Story Continues (11/15/12)

The name "Iran" means "Aryan."  That means that the ancient Persians (ancestors of the Iranians) were descended--at least in part--from Aryans who had moved westward out of India (originally).  The Aryans were the gurus of very ancient (Vedic) India, originating in southern India (Dravidic).  That--in a nutshell--is the truth about the Aryans; there were northern people called "Aryans," who invaded India somewhere around the 3000's BC (before 1500 BC).  Thus the modern Caucasians of today are "Indo-Europeans" who are descended from a mythic Aryan people originating somewhere in eastern Turkey. 

It's true that a people originated in eastern Turkey--after Noah's flood circa 5,500 BC.  These were the children of Noah's three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.  "1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. 2And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there," it says in Genesis 11.  So there is a remnant of truth in the false Aryan origin/invasion theory.

Moving on to angels, it is said by Michael Hur (shieldoftheson on Youtube) that the Cherubim are the highest rank of angels.  This I know to be true.  Hur says that a cherub reflects--to the greatest degree--God's greatness and majesty.  Cherubim have the appearance of beasts, who can shape-shift.  They can appear as dragons--supposed to be where dragon imagery from ancient times originated.  Cherubim can also appear as creatures with the bodies of lions and with the heads of eagles--sounds like the gryphons of myth.  Of course Satan "art the anointed cherub that covereth" (Ezekiel 28:14).  These are spirit bodies that the angels have, as opposed to our earthly bodies. 

According to Hur, a cherub can turn himself into a metallic appearing UFO or flying vehicle.  In essence they can shape-shift into a variety of things.  A cherub can fly without beating their wings.  This kind of angel can soar for ages.  Psalm 18:10 says, "And he rode upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind." 

Immediately below the cherubim in rank are the Seraphim.  I've read that the Seraphim are serpentine in appearance.  I've also read that the Seraphim are shining creatures of light.  It is said that most--if not all--of the rebel angels (a third of the host) are of the Seraphim class.  And the elohim (Anunnaki of the Seraphim kind) "which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation" to take wives from among the daughters of the Sethites (Jude 6).  This was a group of angels--some 200 of them (according to the Book of Enoch) not part of the original rebellion--who decided to transgress the natural laws that God had laid down.  (The Book of Enoch has the names of some of the transgressing group of elohim who came down to earth.  We are told this in Exodus 23:13 concerning their names: "And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.")  So Satan took advantage of this wicked act by these particular Seraphim--to further his agenda: the corruption of man's DNA.

Seraphim can also shape-shift, like their more powerful Cherubim brethren.  Like the latter, the former can also transform into flying metallic ships.  (Now the holy Cherubim and Seraphim do not use their shape-shifting ability to deceive--as the satanic angels do--meaning that the good angels will appear to men and women as God directs them to.)  Perhaps they can turn into large, metal birds too?

By the way, I've become suspicious of Michael Hur.  He asks for money on Youtube.  More like he begs for money.  Christians should be wary of Bible teachers who make an appeal for money.

 

The Story Continues (11/14/12)

 

 

 

The idea that armageddon will occur in North America I received from reading a book about prophecy by Roger Rusk.  Revelation 14:20 says, "And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and sixhundred furlongs."  1,600 furlongs converts to 200 miles.  This verse is another picture of Armageddon: the final battle.  The Valley of Jezreel next to Mt. Megiddo is no where near that size.  The city in this verse may figuratively be speaking of Babylon America.

 

In Ezekiel 39 we have, "14And they shall sever out men of continual employment, passing through the land to bury with the passengers those that remain upon the face of the earth, to cleanse it: after the end of seven months shall they search. 15And the passengers that pass through the land, when any seeth a man's bone, then shall he set up a sign by it, till the buriers have buried it in the valley of Hamongog. 16And also the name of the city shall be Hamonah. Thus shall they cleanse the land." 

 

That does't sound like the Valley of Jezreel, which is 14 miles (northeast to southwest) and 20 miles (northwest to southeast).  It sounds like some place in America, somewhere in the western part.  Somewhere that is a vast piece of land where millions of men can gather for one big fight.  Also, Satan hates Israel--as Revelation 12 tells us.  And the "wilderness" became North America, in the ultimate sense.  And the USA is the regathering of Manasseh, whom God has used to bless the world in a great way--despite the murdering of people worldwide being carried out on a grand scale by US soldiers (in the name of the Synagogue of Satan/Illuminati). 

 

To clarify: armageddon can be seen as the war that starts with the invasion of Palestine--along with the short-lived occupation of Jerusalem--and ends with the final confrontation on North American soil--where Jesus Christ will slay his enemies. 

The Story Continues (11/11/12)

Michael--whose Youtube channel is "shieldoftheson"--says that the sons of God who came among the Sethites and took wives from among their daughters were Atlanteans.  This seems plausible.  Going back before the flood it would appear that the Atlanteans (of the 2nd World Age) were part of the 6th day man of Genesis 1.  So in the time between the beginning of the 2nd World Age and Noah's (regional) flood, we had the world divided between two superpowers: Atlantis and the Rama Empire.  (And I've said that the earliest form of Atlantis goes back to the 1st World Age, having been founded by Satan himself (before he became Satan).)

I've read that Atlantis once fought a war with the Rama Empire.  In its bid to rule the whole world, Atlantis employed cigar-shaped aircraft called "vailixis" to attack Rama (northern India).  Rama had aircraft called "vimanas," and may have defended themselves with them.  The latter successfully fended off the attack of the former.  (And antediluvian helicopters were used, as the Abydos hieroglyph attests.)  This was most likely before the advent of Adam and Eve (the later Anunnaki or elohim, as opposed to the early Anunnaki: Enki, Enlil and the other morning stars).  It is said that Enoch (son of Adam) later came to rule in Atlantis; and Cain came to rule in Rama.

Going back to the 1st World Age, I got the impression that Enlil and Yahweh--and therefore Jesus--are the same person.  Thus you could say that Enlil is the "bright and morning star." (Revelation 22:16)  The pre-incarnate Jesus can be considered to have been among the angels, yet he was the image of God: the Word, who is God.  Psalm 89:7 says, "God is greatly to be feared in the assembly of the saints, and to be had in reverence of all them that are about him."  The "saints" in this verse refers to the angels.  Enki, who is Lucifer, was considered the elder brother of Enlil.  This is because he was the first governor of this solar system--sent by God to govern in his name.  However Enki rebelled against the Creator.  Without going into the details, the Father sent the Ancient of Days (Enlil) to set things right again.  (And I guess Enlil was aided by Ninurta (the archangel Michael).)  But in between Enki's bid to dethrone God and Ninurta being sent into our solar system, it was actually Marduk who had been sent to put down Enki's rebellion.  He did so, and then he turned around and went against his God--becoming the son of Enki (spiritually).  And then Yahweh--with the help of Michael (Ninurta)--crushed Marduk's (now Satan's) rebellion.  Thus Genesis 1:2 is the aftermath of the war in heaven that occurred after Genesis 1:1.

With the dawn of the 2nd World Age, the Assembly of the Gods decided to create man (6th day) to "replenish the earth" (Genesis 1:28).  (By the way, it appears that the dinosaurs were part of the 1st World Age, and they pretty much disappeared once the 2nd World Age commenced.)  Once they gained knowledge of a prior civilization called "Atlantis," men decided to revive it.  Meanwhile Enki--who had been thrown down to the earth along with Marduk--attempted to duplicate Enlil or YHWH's creation of man: the former created such creatures as Homo Erectus, Neanderthals, and Bigfoot.  Enki had (still has) advanced technology, but he is no God.  And the Ancient of Days put down this endeavor (also), and Enki died: he disappeared from this 3-dimensional plane.

Let us fast-forward to Noah's regional flood.  (Preceding this flood another flood had swallowed up Atlantis in 9,600 BC--for it had become corrupt.)  One theory has the deluge of the Black Sea (circa 5,500 BC)--when the Mediterranean massively poured into the Black Sea, converting it from a fresh water lake into an inland sea--as the flood in which God saved Noah and his family from the destruction of the people they lived amongst.  So the ark settled in the mountains of Ararat (Urartu) to the east.  It is from here that the early Sumerians (Ubaids) came into Shinar (Mesopotamia) from the east.  They were of one language.  When they constructed a tower in defiance of God, that's when they were scattered into different language groups.  Then the Akkadians rose to prominence.  And their first king was Nimrod (which may have been a title), a son of Ham.  However, he took on another title: Sargon, in honor of the antediluvian Sargon the Magnificent (Cain).  Nimrod or Sargon ruled from Babel, where earlier the inhabitants were scattered and never finished the tower.  And after Nimrod, Asshur (a son of Shem) gained the preeminence.

So most likely the early Sumerians or Ubaids partly came from the Indus Valley: they were the Aryans.  And the later Sumerians who came to dominance in the area were the Semetic Akkadians.  ("Sumerians" was a catch-all name.)  Thus the Chaldeans were an Akkadian/Aryan mixture.  Which explains how the name "Rama" made its way into Mesopotamia and further westward--by way of Abraham and Sarah--into the Levant.  Matthew 2:18 says, "In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not."

One last thing: this imminent war with Iran is that which is spoken of in Daniel 8, in which the USA is going down.  Then the Antichrist--after bringing in a deceptive peace--will launch the war of Ezekiel 38.  This will begin with the short-lived occupation of Jerusalem and end with the invasion of an America that has lost its military might and whose major cities have been burned with fire (where will be Armageddon): we read (after Gog's ultimately unsuccessful (as Zechariah 12 tells us) invasion of the "mountains of Israel" or the Land of Promise) in Ezekiel 38, "10Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil thought: 11And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates, 12To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land."       

The Pre-Existence of Man or Mangels

A good number of truths are not taught to people in the majority of churches.  One of them is the indications--in the word of God--that we existed prior to being born into this physical world and inhabiting these physical bodies that we have.  Beginning with Genesis 1:1 we move onto verse 2, which intriguingly says: "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters."  Something cataclysmic happened between verse 1 and verse 2.  Known as the "gap theory" it's got a lot to back it up.  (The rest of Genesis 1 is an account of the 6 (not literal) days of creation--or rather, recreation.)

A telling verse that sheds light on the truth of the gap theory is Jeremiah 4:23: "I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light."  You can't read that verse without being reminded of verse 2 of Genesis.  Now if you read some of the verses following Jer. 4:23, you will see a picture of the earth in the First World Age (before mankind was created): "24I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
25I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled. 26I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger."  The kind of "man" that lived before this (present) Second World Age were the angels.  And we (mankind) were numbered among them.  We were the part of the angels (a third?) who remained neutral during that first rebellion.  After the war ended and Lucifer and the third of the angels (who sided with him) were thrown down to the earth. (Revelation 12)  (But it appears that the earth they crashed down upon had descended from a higher frequency of vibration, if you will.  Thus they are considered higher dimensional beings by us earthlings who are "trapped" in this physical plane.)

The scriptures have a number of verses that indicate that we were once angels.  An example is in Hebrews 11: "13These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. 14For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a country. 15And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned. 16But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city." Of course on one level this pertains to the Israelites leaving Egypt; on another level it is speaking of us having come from a different "country" or plane of existence. And we who've put our faith in Christ Jesus will be like the angels (once more). 

Now with the creation of the 6th day man in Genesis 1, it may be that mankind started out in the Second World Age at a higher vibration than what men and women are currently vibrating at.  Thus mankind has been in a gradual descent ever since.  Another way of saying it is that man has been devolving: devolution instead of evolution.  The 8th day man--Adam and Eve in Genesis 2--were also created to vibrate at a higher frequency.  The garden in Eden was an enclosed, self-contained greenhouse, if you will.  We read in Genesis 2: "5And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. 6But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground."  This was a greenhouse that was protected from the outside world by some sort of force field--reminiscent of the mountain island of Hyperborea, which was surrounded by an impenetrable, turbulent sea.

In the garden Adam and Eve were most likely created as creatures who inhabited a higher dimension than the one we are in now.  This is hinted at by them being "naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed." (Gen. 2:25)  They were to produce the line through which the Christ would come into the world.  For God knew that Adam and Eve would sin against their Creator, and God's Holy One would need to be born as a man--that mankind could be redeemed from condemnation.  Of course when Jesus Christ walked the earth as a man, he did so as the kinsman redeemer of Israel.  (Israel was supposed to be a light unto the rest of the world, and unfortunately they've more often than not failed at that.)

As for the 6th day man created in Genesis 1, I think there was more than one "man" created.  By the time of Adam (the 8th day man of Genesis 2) and Eve, the entire earth was inhabited by men and women.  And the "man" that the Anunnaki (those who from heaven came) created to be their slave in the gold mines--had to be some kind of "hominoid."  (That may be a word that Lloyd Pye has coined.)  The Anunnaki cannot be trusted.  They never point to the Creator--their Creator also.  It may very well be that the creatures--we know as "bigfoot" or "sasquatch--are the descendants of these hominoids who dug for gold in the mines of southern Africa. 

The Anunnaki who created these hominoids or hominids (for there are several kinds of hominoids) were the earliest Anunnaki to arrive on the earth after the end of the First World Age--marked by great destruction, upon which God rebuilt the earth.  These Anunnaki apparently inspired the Sumerian tablets that have come down to our time.  These accounts of the conflict between two gods--the brothers Enlil and Enki--are a mess.  I get the impression of obfuscation from my own study of the Sumerian tablets.  I'm no expert (I can't read the cuneiform.), but I cannot help but sense that the early Anunnaki were not being entirely upfront with their human subjects (the post-flood Sumerians).  These records also tell us that Enlil wanted to drown the Sumerians because they were too noisy.  This sounds ludicrous to me.  Besides if Enki and Lucifer are indeed one and the same individual, then he was not directly involved in the event of Genesis 6, which led up to God flooding Sumeria--supposedly having saved man (by way of the ark), once Enlil supposedly intended to drown all the Sumerians.  By the time of Noah's flood (circa 5000 BC) Enki or Lucifer was already long gone, having been cast into the abyss (which I cover below)--and any of his physical remains (I've read that his (physical) crown was found.) would have been archaeological finds even in that time perhaps.    

These Anunnaki (after their rebellion in the First World Age) may have become mortal--in the course of interfering with the affairs of the earth, once the Second Age commenced.  We have this quite interesting passage (Psalm 82:1,2-6,7): "God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.  How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked? Selah...I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.  But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes."  Once Enki died, he was thrown into the bottomless pit (the center of the earth that exists in the 4th dimension.  And it may be that once that happened, Marduk (Satan) gained the upper hand, becoming the current god of this world.  So anyway I guess to their credit these Anunnaki did--by their name: "Anu" refers to heaven and also to the Creator who reigns over all from that highest realm, and "ki" refers to the earth--acknowledge that they came from above and thereby implied that there was a God that was above them.

Of course YHWH also created a variety of "man" and set him in other parts of the world.  After all Elohim may speak of God and the sons of God.  We have a type of "Caucasian" people who once inhabited the Pacific (where the continent of Mu once was) and who fled to the islands of the South Pacific, after said continent went under the waters of a regional superflood.  And then you have Cro-Magnon man who suddenly appeared in Western Europe (circa 40,000 BC or maybe earlier) and moved eastward, displacing the Neanderthals as they did.  It is said that the Cro-Magnons originated on the island of Appalachia (in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean), on which the city of Atlantis was located.  These Atlanteans may have fled a destruction of Atlantis (that preceded the destruction of said city later about 9,600 BC--spoken of by Plato).  Perhaps all these comprise the 6th day man of Genesis 1.  (Atlantis may be a civilization that originated in the First World Age, but it was started up again by man in the Second World Age.)   

Then much time passed--during the 7th day in which God rested from his millenia-long reconstructing of the devastated earth (Gen. 1:2).  And we come upon the time of Genesis 2: the 8th day.  It is suggested by firstlegend.info--they cite frequently from the book of Urantia, which claims to speak of Jesus Christ but truly does not--that the 8th day man (Adam and his helpmate Eve) were the much later (last) appearance of the Anunnaki on the earth (in Sumeria).  The saying--kingship came down from heaven to the earth and established itself in Eridu--was the result of the advent of Adam and Eve.  (Adam's son, Seth, established his rulership at the city of Eridu.)  This sounds plausible.  And by extension (broadly speaking) we are also of the Anunnaki or sons of God (elohim).  Speaking of Jesus in Hebrews 2:10, we have: "For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings."  By the "son of man" (earlier--in verse 6 of Hebrews 2) we can become sons of God.

And next we have the appearance among the sons of Seth in Sumeria (or Eden) another group of Elohim (sons of God) or Anunnaki.  These left "their first estate," as Jude verse 6 states.  These angels saw the beauty of the daughters of men (children of Seth) and were overcome with lust.  They then came down and took for themselves wives from among the Sethites.  This was according to God's way, and it led to a group of offspring called the Nephilim: half man/half angelic hybrids.  Your typical (shouldn't have been typical) giant Nephilim lived perhaps to be around 700 years old.  Once a Nephilim died, his or her spirit--being unnatural--would roam the earth seeking physical bodies (be they man or beast) to house themselves in.  Most likely these Nephilim were driven, for the most part, beneath the earth--that is into the hollow earth.

In the scriptures there may be another bit of evidence that Adam and Eve go back to around 47,000 BC.  We have this interesting set of verses: "And Shebuel the son of Gershom, the son of Moses, was ruler of the treasures.  And his brethren by Eliezer; Rehabiah his son, and Jeshaiah his son, and Joram his son, and Zichri his son, and Shelomith his son." (1 Chronicles 26:24-25)  In the context of which these verses occurs, they are speaking of the time of King David.  We know that Moses fathered Gershom.  However Gershom's son, Shebuel, must be a descendant of a number of generations later.  Moses lived around 1600 BC and David lived around 1000 BC.  We see that in the word of God when so-and-so was said to be the son of so-and-so, it does not necessarily mean that the former was the direct offspring of the latter.  The best example of that would be when Jesus was called "son of David."  So it appears that a good number of generations--between Gershom and Shebuel--were not named.  Gershom's brother, Eliezer--the other son of Moses--has four generations named between him and Shelomith, his descendant of David's day.  Again, we must conclude that some generations were skipped.  It must be that the writer of the Books of the Chronicles of the Kings did not record all the generations because not all of them were worthy of being written down.  Likewise from Adam to Noah we have ten generations: it may very well be that an unknown number of (unremarkable) generations were left out of the record (of the antediluvian patriarchs).