The Story Continues (11/22/12)

 

It may be that when Francis Bacon and his friends shaped the English language--the King James Version of the Bible--that came down to us, Bacon simultaneously transmitting the truth to us from the original languages (Hebrew and Greek) and also obfuscating at the same time.  The English language is equivocal.  There are many words that have multiple meanings.  The word "love" has different shades of meaning, unlike in the Greek where you have different words for the specific kinds of love: agape being the greatest form of love, which only God can express.  And especially today people are turned off from reading the KJV Bible because the language is too archaic, in their eyes.

 

Bacon, being an occultist, knew that Satan attempts to counterfeit God.  (Therefore Satan is obligated to tell people what he intends to do before he does it.)  This is how God operates, as Amos 3:7 says, "Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets."  And so Bacon was compelled to transmit the truth via the Authorized Version of the Bible, but he--since he was a servant of Satan--sought to make the truth difficult to grasp.  For example, Zionism is of the antichrist spirit.  Yet many "Christians" today--especially those in the USA--are Zionist "Christians."  This sad state of affairs is not wholly the result of the (seeming) obliqueness of the Authorized Version or the KJV.  The wicked ones foisting on the people all these other modern (corrupt) Bible versions have also played a major role in the great deception and apostasy--such as the NIV, the Message, etc.  

 

Going back to the equivocality thing what really makes the equivocalness of the English language drive one to exasperation can be: how the word "repent" is used in the Bible, concerning God himself.  Genesis 6:6 says, "And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."  Yet in Deuteronomy 23:19 we have: "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"  Perhaps this was done to confuse people?  Certainly in Gen. 6:6 the LORD is not actually repenting of his creation of man.  After all, the Father sent his only begotten Son to be born as a man.  "45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven." (1 Corinthians 15)