Monday, April 29, 2013

Esoteric History: Aryans/Adamites/Sethites


It appears that the Aryans were actually Adamites (who were Caucasian in appearance).  These Aryans lived in Western China (Tarim Basin).  You see Adam and Eve were driven from the Garden to the east--the Tarim Basin or Xinjiang.  They built magnificent cities and overall were a sophisticated people.  It was these Aryans that gifted a higher level of civilization to the Chinese.  It was also these Aryans (Whites) who established a proto-Hinduism in Northern India (the Rama Empire).  (Cain may have a bit later added his own twist to Hinduism with the Hindu trinity: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva.)

According to this very plausible theory Noah's flood would have occurred around 3800 BC.  (Couldn't it have occurred earlier?--say around 5500 BC?)  You see, I'm trying to reconcile the flood that created the Black Sea further west with this flood that took place in the Tarim Basin. 

Now before this regional flood in the Tarim Basin (Noah's flood) it had to be these White Adamites/Aryans who are the players in the great Aryan epics, such as the Mahabharata.  It may very well be that that story is about a family feud--between the House of Seth and the House of Cain--or a conflict between two families within the Sethite line.  Thus the Bhagavad Gita is a spiritual treatise that was the work of the Aryans.  It is my opinion that the happenings in Genesis 6 are elaborated upon in the Mahabharata.  (In the pre-flood world of the Mahabharata high technology was in use: space/aircraft that resemble the UFOs (flying saucers) and speculative fiction spaceships found in comics and movies.)  This means that this epic is older than 3800 BC.  5500 BC perhaps?  If this date for the Mahabharata war is accurate--and if we are to believe that Nibiru/Planet X/Nemesis is true--then said war occurred sometime after said planet (actually Nibiru is the sun's partner star that has its own planet(s)) came into our solar system.  Hmmm. 

What I'm wondering about is this thing about Rama having been an avatar of Vishnu--and Krishna later being an avatar of Vishnu also.  Could it be that Satan was trying to counterfeit the three manifestations of God?: the Father, the Son (being the image of the Father), and the Holy Spirit (the infinite mind of God--omnipresent and omniscient).  Satan, through Cain, coming up with the Hindu trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva?

If you consider the name "Abraham," you can see how it is reminscent of Abraham's lineage going back to Northern India and the Tarim Basin.  "Abraham" is similar to "Brahma."  The Aryans were the Brahmin--scholars bringing enlightenment--to India.

Then it can be said that the Aryans, after Noah's flood, went westward and took over the already present Sumerian civilization (becoming known as the Akkadians).  These Aryans, descended from Noah's family, were starting over again as far as civilization was concerned.  It may very well be that by Noah's time (before the flood) the Sethites had declined in terms of their technology.  They no longer possessed advanced aircraft; they were getting around in horse-drawn chariots and wagons.  Most likely the coming of Nibiru (about 3100 BC) caused such destruction that civilization collapsed (once more). 

Earlier the Kenites (Sons of Cain) also came along from Nod (to the east) to influence the Sumerians. We are told of seven sages (Abgal) coming into Sumer from the east.  These Abgal were created by Enki (anagram for Cain).  Oannes was the leader of the Abgal.  He was supposed to have been a fish god--Dagon being another name for him.  "Oannes" is another way of saying Enoch (son of Cain).  The fish meme may be symbolic of how the Kenites (Cain and his son Enoch) were not overtaken by the flood.  Manu, the Vedic corruption of Noah, was aided by a fish when a flood came upon Northern India.  This could be speaking of Naamah--daughter of Lamech (a son of Cain)-- who may very well have been Ham's wife.  (Ham appears to have had a tendency to perversion.  Not only did he marry a Kenite woman, but he uncovered his father's nakedness--had sex with his father's wife--the offspring of said union was Canaan.)  Therefore part of the Kenite line went through the flood by way of Naamah marrying Ham.

Thus the Aryans brought enlightenment to Mesopotamia and Egypt.  They may have been adding on to earlier contributions by the Atlanteans.  The Aryans (children of Shem, Ham, and Japheth) would raise the level of civilization to its highest levels--bringing about its greatest achievements.  These Aryans being the descendants of the last of the Anunnaki: Adam and Eve.

Plato pointed out that civilization is cyclical: it rises and it falls and it rises again.  It could be that the flood of 5500 BC that devastated the area of the Black Sea (and by extension Sumeria)--turning that lake into a sea that is connected to the Mediterranean--left the region in a pitiable state as far as culture and the other trappings of civilization are concerned.  And about 3150 BC a bolide (comet or asteroid) struck the Mediterranean, leaving much devastation (similar to the comet that exploded over Ireland in 562 AD, which severely affected much of the Europe's weather for at least a decade).  Then the Aryans (descendants of Noah) came along and raised it back up again--and even to a higher state of accomplishment.  It may be that the peoples in the Mediterranean and the Middle East at this time were the children of Adamites who had migrated from the Tarim Basin before the flood of Noah.

 

57 comments:

  1. Aryan invasion is a popular myth advocated by west. Simply putting Germans invented it, British used it. Some points to prove this wrong

    1. In all our Vedic scriptures there is no mention of any land outside Indian subcontinent. The farthest west is Gandhar(khandhar today)
    2. Rig Veda the oldest of the oldest scripture mentions of a river called sarswati. This was the main river on whose bank civilization like mohanzadro flourished. This river dried up some 4000 bc and these river valley civilization where destroyed. The advocates of aryan invasion says aryans invaded Indian subcontinent in 1500 bc. They brought knowledge of Vedas. How come they knew about a river which dried up 2500 years before there come ?

    On contrary I believe some people from Indian subcontinent invaded/migrated to west. Notice the similarity between Brahma and Abraham. Not on this entire Greek mythology is similar to Indian mythology. The ved mentions Indra as king of god with thunderbolt(Zeus). The great flood, and surviver manu(Noah ). And all of us descendent of manu( German mythology, all are sons of Mannus)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Aryans were the descendants of Noah. Noah and his family settled in Northwest India after the flood in the Tarim Basin. They were White People. They established the Aryan civilization that was along the Sarasvati. This happened before 1500 BC. These Aryans became corrupt, so God dried up the Sarasvati. Thus the Aryans migrated westward, ending up in the plain of Shinar (Iraq). From there Abraham was called out from the heathen society of the Akkadian/Aryans. Abraham was the father of Isaac, who was the father of Jacob. From Jacob came the Twelve Tribes of Israel (Jacob). And from Israel arose the Achaen Greeks. In closing the Aryans (Caucasians) are the descendants of Noah and his three sons.

      Delete
  2. Not all Aryans went to Shinar some of them stayed in India ,which are today Brahmin elite in India. The are descendats of Joktan Abhiri or Habhiri or Hebrew. Abhir or biblical Eber ancestor of Hebrew had two sons Peleg and Joktan . Gypsies also descent from this peolpe they are descendants of Abhir Abraham and Keturah . Keturah she was descent from Veda Aryan clan from Joktan. So Gypsies are also half Veda Aryans.Midian son of Anraham and Keturah is the Ancestor of all Gypsies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seem to know your history--your geneaology (of the Aryans). I cannot refute what you've said, so good work. The more I look into this the more I see that--though the majority of the Aryans (Noah's descendants in this sense) migrated westward--some of them most likely stayed behind: in the Indus Valley and also along the Himalayas. It also appears that--besides some of them (Joktan's descendants as you've pointed out) staying in India--some of them may have moved into Southeast Asia. For their influence--in terms of Vedic names and words--can be seen in the east as well as the west.

      Delete
  3. Not all descendant of Noah are Aryans. Its true Namah wife of Noah was daughter of Cain ,but she was born before Angels fall. Namah was not carried any progeny from fallen Angels. IT WAS HAM'S WIFE WHO CARRIED PROGENY FROM ARYAN NEPHILIM BLOOD.It was Lilith or Kali Sara or Ishthar daughter who carried progeny from Nephilim ,she was mortal daughter of Lilith. (Lilith is fallen Angel Aza who represent Women power on the Earth. )Arabian tribe Qathan claim descencet from Joktan son of Eber.Gypsies Roma not all GYPSIES can claim descended from Veda Aryans because Abraham was descend from Veda Aryans or Abhiri or ApiruOr Habiru or Hebrew from Saravasti.Abraham was descend from Abir Peleg from Yadhava clan (Sethite clan). Kethura was Kenite origin or Cain origin or Guttian Sumerian or Tocharian or Turanian or whatever you want to call it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point about Azazel being Lilith is interesting. I must say that Naamah was a Kenite. A "Kenite"--by definition--is one who is a descendant of Cain. Kali Sara was Lilith? Ishtar was the daughter of Lilith? Also interesting. As for Keturah, whatever her family background, I don't think she was a Kenite. More likely she was a descendant of Joktan.

      Delete
  4. DESCENDATS OF JOKTAN WERE AKKADIANS OR GUTTIANS OR TURANIANS OR TOCHARIANS THEY ARE ARYANS same people. Eber or hindu Abhir married to pure Aryan or Kushite women they formed Semitic Aryan race. By the way Kali Sara and Ishtar or Lilith is the same thing.It was her daughter who carried progeny to new World. So not all are descendants of Aryum. Aryum mean half Cain and half Angel.

    ReplyDelete
  5. NAMAH WAS PURE CAIN .SHE WAS BORN BEFORE ANGELS FALL!.

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://m.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.uk%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D1%26ved%3D0CCoQFjAA%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.africaresource.com%252Frasta%252Fsesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules%252Fkushites-of-sumer-and-akkad-by-clyde-winters-phd%252F%26ei%3DYxkEUvm8F4qO0AW_joGwCA%26usg%3DAFQjCNGuI2TYO5nkIcDrNI7Ls4ok6RKL0Q&h=qAQGUx3Ez&s=1

    ReplyDelete
  7. If i'm said Abiru/Habiru (Hebrew) by Joktan or Kenite or Akkadian or Turanian or Tocharian or Scythic or Sumerian I actually talking about same people. All these peolpe were origin!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, they all go back to Adam and Eve (and the serpent--Satan). The Kenites are/were the descendants of Cain, who was the offspring of Satan and Eve. The Akkadian/Aryans were the descendants of Noah, who was of the bloodline of Adam and Eve.

      Delete
  8. There is no such thing like of spring Satan and Eve . Kenite were tribe of Akkadian they were Joktanite Hebrew in fact. Only surviver from Nephilim was Enonia daughter of Lilith. Which she was wife of Ham son of Noah. Akkadian King Sargon I =Nimrud. I was realy suprised to find out that Nimrud was Joktanite Hebrew. Akkadians were half Semitic half Kushite Guttians-Tocharians. Also Peleg Hebrew same origin they were half Kushite too. Eber the ancestor of Hebrew was half Kushite. Hebrew peolpe if they worshiped Sun they claim Kushite origin ,and if they worship Yahweh they claim Semitic origin bouth was right in fact. Semitic peolpe mixed with Kushite to get their power so Kushite did too.They created Brahmin race ,which are Hebrew Superior Race chosen to rule and inteligence. Semitic get autority from Yahweh and Kushite get power and Knowledge from Nephilim ,and what they done?They mixed to became most powerfull peolpe . They did this on very bigining just after flood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is not true. From the union between the serpent (Satan) and Eve came Cain. If you study Genesis carefully and are open to the truth, you will see this. In fact the whole of the Bible speaks of this truth: that there has been a struggle between two seedlines down through the centuries: the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman (Genesis 3:15). You are right about the Hebrews being superior, for Yahveh Elohim chose Abram (of which Brahma is an anagram of) and took him from out of the heathen Chaldeans/Akkadians/Aryans--to be the father of Israel, God's chosen people (coming through Abraham's son, Isaac, and through Isaac's younger son, Jacob).

      Delete
  9. Genesis 4 is pretty clear! Cain was son of Adam and Eve .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On the surface it looks like it says that Cain was the son of Adam and Eve. But not so. The garden story tells us that both the serpent (Satan) and Adam impregnated Eve. Cain, the elder son, was fathered by Satan. Abel, the younger son, was fathered by Adam. You need to study that passage more. It is much deeper than most people realize: there are levels of meaning in those first few chapters of Genesis.

      Delete
  10. If I said Hebrew it doesn't mean Jews! Decendants of Abraham and Keturah were Hebrew too actualy they were more pure Hebrew then Jews. Jews decent from Jacob from his 12sons they were 75%Syrian they lost their Hebrew origin in fact.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's not true. Israel, who are the descendants of the 12 sons of Jacob, are the Hebrews. (Besides, the Syrians were a kindred people: the people in that area all being Adamites.)

      Delete
  11. I thought all white people/caucasians came from the Aryans/Nephilim? Where do you think the occultist and Nazis got there "blue blonde super alien" idea from? ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is true that all Caucasians are descended from the Aryans; the Nephilim are a different group all together. These were/are the offspring of the Elohim (angels or sons of God) and human women. As for the Nazis and their idea of "alien" Aryans, it is based on myth--and all myths have some truth in them (or they may twist the truth). The Aryans of today are descended from Adam & Eve (by way of Noah & his 3 sons). Genesis chptr 2 details Yahveh's 2nd dealing with Adam. And it should be understood that this is the same Adam spoken of in the 1st chptr of Genesis (from Gen. 1:27 to the end of said chptr, to be exact). Adam & Eve and their descendants are not aliens (in the sense of the popular understanding of that word), but they are angels. In the earliest age of the earth (Tiamat), they were all or part of the 1/3 angels who followed Lucifer in his rebellion against the most High. These were the 1st days of Atlantis/Lemuria. This is implied by verse 2 of Gen. 1--and spoken of by other passages in scripture and also extra-biblical texts. (I think that Gen. 1:27 is speaking of the 1st dealing with Adam (after Lucifer's rebellion), and this would be the time of Hyperborea, which preceded the Triple City (Atlantis) on the prehistoric island in the Atlantic. Of course the Bible is all about God's dealings with the Elect (Israel), those who are the sons of Jacob--who was the grandson of Abraham, whom God called from out of the heathen Aryan/Akkadians in the land of the Chaldees.)

      Delete
  12. Izack son of Abraham maried to Syrian women and their son Jacob also maried to Syrian wifes the Laban daughters. So dont know your point. Whatever Juda had two sons with Tamara she was Midianite /Gypsies she was daughter of Epher ben Midian. So some or most Judas were half Gypsies. Tamara pedegree is very well documented because many kings came out from her. Judas geting back their Hebrew origin because Tamara was pure Hebrew by her ancestors Abraham and Keturah. Keturah was also Hebrew by Joktan side she was Akkadian. Biblical Eber or Abhir or Habir ancestor of Hebrew had two sons Peleg and Joktan ,from Joktan was Keturah and from Peleg was Abraham they were related. Keturah was daughter of Akkadian King Sagon I (biblical Nimrod). why Hebrew are Aryans? Hebrew peolpe descent from Kushite wife of Eber . Hebrew and Akadians allready came to Sumer half Kushite. They moved from Levant were mixed with Nubians and after they came to Sumer and Elam and latter to India.Aryans from India and Midlle East descent from this peolpe.
    Akkadian Germans or Bawarian Iluminati they came with idea that White peolpe are Superior or Aryans its brain wash. i just wonder why? They need white peolpe to get on their side. ITS LIE WHITE ARE NOT ARYANS. THEY ARE CAVE MANS. Descendants of Ham were pure Aryans /Noble or Nefilim. Not Jafetic peolpe. The Aryan religion the sun worshiping and knowledge came from Hamitic peolpe. Semitic peolpe steal the knowledge and power from Hamitic peolpe. Hamitic peolpe had high advance civilization not Jafetic and they and they are the real Aryans . Jafetic peolpe were cave man with out the knowledge . The Jewish and Akkadians brought knowledge to Europe and they built civilization in Europe not Jafetic Whites .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are quite confused. What you have said is not actual history. The Hamites--including Kush--were a fair-skinned people in the beginning--when the Aryans (Semites, Hamites, and Japhites) arrived in Shinar. Black Africans are not descended from Ham--if that is what you're implying. The European/White people are not the progeny of Japheth. The Europeans--Anglo-Saxons, Scottish, French, Irish, German, etc.--are Semitic: they are descended from Shem. The Aryans--specifically the Europeans--are the Israelites today. Yes, Hamites were/are Aryans also. In other words those of North Africa (who are Hamitic) are the children of Ham.

      Delete
  13. I have a question........ Where, When, How, and Why did the split, mutation, or change occur to make certain people melanin defficient, or turn white?
    I know that Jacob's mother tells him to ONLY go to Padan Aram, or the Plain of Aram in Syria to her uncle laban, and take a wife only from his family.
    Laban means to make or cause to be white like a clay brick drying in the sun........ so what was going on in that family, within that bloodline causing that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's start with Adam and Eve. Let's establish first that not all humans today are descended from Adam and Eve. The Sub-Saharan Africans (Black Africans) and the Chinese are not descended from Adam and Eve. This couple was white. (One of the meanings of Adam is "ruddy.") They established a civilization in the Tarim Basin (Western China), most likely. The survivors of this (later) corrupted society were the eight people on Noah's ark. After the local flood Noah and his progeny entered Northern India (Kurukshetra), becoming the last of the Aryans--this being the mythical Aryan invasion (circa 2400-2000 BC). Having said this, there may have been some mutation going on. As the Aryans moved westward, they were--broadly speaking--Caucasian or Caucasoid. (The Mittani were part of this westward migration of the Aryans. Nefertiti, who was a princess from Mittani, appears to be Caucasian (with perhaps some Asian/Indian mixed in).) And then there were the Sumerians who were already in Shinar when the Aryans arrived--though many of the Sumerians had already fled the area in advance of the approaching Aryans. The Sumerians had to be a black-haired people. The invading Aryans became the Akkadians, taking over the area. There probably was some mixing between the Aryans and the remaining Aryans. Hammurabi, an Akkadian king of Babylon, spoke of his subjects as being black-headed: meaning black-haired. Now when it comes to the Elect--the offspring of Jacob and his two wives (Rachel and Leah)--we can say that they are the ones from whom the Europeans are descended. In other words the fair-skinned (being able to get flushed in the cheeks) and often fair-haired peoples of the Christian nations are the Israelites--God's Elect. Thus it can be said that Jacob and his kin in Syria were the fairest of the fair. Just as the name Laban indicates (as you pointed out).

      Delete
  14. You still not getting do you? Aryan blood is not from Adam is from Nephilim or fallen Angel daughter, which she was Wife of Ham! Hebrew were half Kushite which Kush was son of Ham . Ebers Mother was Horite or Kushite. And that's the reason why Akkadian and Jews can claim Aryan origin or better Semitic -Aryan origin. But pure Aryan Sun race are from Ham via Kush.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's you who are not getting it. It may very well be that Ham's wife was Naamah,,a descendant of Cain. They were all Aryan: Ham was white. Subsaharan Africans are not descended from Ham. By the way why don't you give your name, "Anonymous?"

      Delete
  15. So Kushite where originaly White? Ouuu thats news for me. By the way Namah was wife of Noah she wasnt wife of Ham thats Jewish lie! Ham wife was Enonia daughter of Ishtar which is fallen angel Aza. Yes thats true some Aryans were white and of course because were Semitic and half Kushitic. The Aryan blood was pass by Enonia Ishtar daughter i dont know if she was half Cain or she was pure Nephilim/Aryan blood. But she was mortal for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, Naamah was Ham's wife. That's why Nimrod could claim the throne of Babylon (founded by Cain circa 3800 BC), because the former had the latter's blood in him. That's what made it possible for Nimrod to claim the Babylonian throne, when the Aryans (Noah and his descendants) entered Shinar. Shem had no Kenite blood in him: that's why his children (Semites) came to prominence: Asshur overthrew Nimrod, thus establishing the Assyrian Empire. So the Jewish lie is that the Gentiles (the nations mentioned in Genesis 10) all have Cain's blood in them. In truth it is the Synagogue of Satan (those who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie) who are the Kenites.

      Delete
  16. The first King and only king in Sumer was Allulim which was Azael or Lucifer . He was King and God no Cain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Lucifer was the first ruler of Atlantis--back in the first age. Cain was his son, from Eve. Cain rose to power about 3800 BC--being the founder of Babylon. All the extra-biblical evidence supports this. "Allulim" is just a name that was put out to obfuscate.

      Delete
  17. Before flood of course

    ReplyDelete
  18. Before flood Cain clan were very primitive. They had not any knowledge that was brought by fallen Angels.Cain was not King he became wampire /canibal and priest of Sun /Aryan religion. Cain was son of Adam not Lucifer he became his son but not literaly. Spiritualy he became his son because he follow Lucifers order. Bible is pretty clear about Cain he was son of Adam by blood.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A surface reading appears to say that Cain was literally fathered by Adam. You have to understand the deeper meaning of the garden account. What does eating of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil symbolize? I shouldn't be surprised that somebody like you would not want to look any deeper. Or maybe you do understand what actually happened in the garden, but you're working to obscure the matter. Hmmm?

      Delete
  19. Aryan Sun religion was founded by fallen angels Azael and Aza. It was Nimrod who start follow this religion after flood and he was Kushite! Aryan blood was pass by Kushite ! Not by Jafet or Shem! Nimrod was Akkadian king Sargon I he was Kushite but also Semitic because he was descendant of Joktan brother of Peleg. He could claim Aryan origin because he was hlaf Kushite. Semitic peolpe if they worship Sun they claim Aryan or Kushitic origin and if they worship Yahweh they claim Sekitic origin bouth was right!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon, you've got some truth mixed in with bullshit. Cain was the son of Lucifer. Keep on believing in lies, if you want.

      Delete
  20. Bible is pretty clear about Cains pedigree ,don't you think. So what you trying to tell me that Bible is lie???? Cain was reicanated with the fallen Angels and that's the reason why he could be called his son. Even today Iluminaty are reicanated and they become their children. Aryan blood and Aryan religion countinue after flood by Sumerians and Sumerians were Kushite or Not? Or they have been Jafetic???? Do u really think that Azazel was under authority of Cain? Cain could be some of kind of King but the main one was Azazel don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, the Bible does not lie; you're the one who's lying. Go back and study those early chapters of Genesis again, my child. (Cain was under the authority of his biological father, Satan--just as Cain's children (the Synagogue of Satan) are under Heylel's authority today.)

      Delete
    2. Kush was not a Sumerian. The Sumerians were a people who were already living in Shinar when Kush and his fellow Aryans (Noah and his children) arrived in the area--having come from India after the Sarasvati River--along which they had been living--dried up (circa 2000 BC).

      Delete
  21. Absolute power was never given to people my love ,they allways rule via Angels spirit or in the case, for example of David or Salomon he ruled via Yahweh spirit.Deeper meaning of what happen in Eden you talking about desire what have Eve to be divine? Be like the God? But trouble is ,she didn't know that's not gona be absolute. Humans be allways under Angel's and Yahweh's authority. That's reality!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In principle you are right, my sweet. Satan wants to be as God; he will never be as God. Notwithstanding, you do not grasp the deeper layer of truth that the garden story conveys. This truth explains how this world--that we live in today--really operates. Kindly go back and do more study.

      Delete
  22. Genesis 4:
    Now Adam had intercourse with Eve his wife and she became pregnant. In the time she gave birth to Cain and said:" I have produced a man with the aid of Yahuwah .Later she again gave birth to his brother Abel.
    So do you think that Cain was son of Azazel? Also do you think that Abel wasn't his brother?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, that is a surface reading. You must properly interpret the garden story in Genesis. The actual/factual meaning is there, if you are open to it. Knock, and it will be opened unto you. (Cain and Abel were half-brothers: same mother, different fathers. Eve gave the credit to YHVH for her being able to bear her first manchild--for Lucifer/Satan impregnated her first. Right after that Adam impregnated her also. Both these sexual unions happened when Adam and Eve were still in the garden. Again, Cain's father was Lucifer--call him Azazel if you wish.)

      Delete
  23. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-BVnQaeUtFMC&pg=PA106&lpg=PA106&dq=Veda+Aryans+Gypsies&source=bl&ots=n7uh9G6YtP&sig=zVm-4KKj3M8Lq333WC1kpVRahjs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wzD6UdmyD_OY0QWXs4DYDQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBg

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-SFJfEZwu_kC&pg=PA20&lpg=PA20&dq=Kushite+proto+sumerian+elamites&source=bl&ots=7THQLrhSMF&sig=posa6OCJbCyAcjEaosKfgYNukhI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mwXlUsXFLsiThQen_ICACw&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBQ

    ReplyDelete
  25. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=-SFJfEZwu_kC&pg=PA19&lpg=PA20&ots=7THQLrhSMF&focus=viewport&dq=Kushite+proto+sumerian+elamites&output=html_text

    ReplyDelete
  26. Again, that is a surface reading. You must properly interpret the garden story in Genesis "Ok my friend i just hope you have good proves of that!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The proof is in the Bible. It's time for you to do some more studying, my child. Find a good teacher: there are very few of them, but they're out there.

      Delete
    2. I've just added a new post to this blog, in which is a transcript of a debate I had with a friend--who did not believe in the serpent seed doctrine. Check it out. If you know what is good for you, you'll go and read it to get some serious schooling.

      Delete
  27. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=PuLrUsf9FqiP7AaGmYCoDw&url=http://eden-saga.com/en/odyssey-rama-exodus-armenia-indo-persian-conquest.html&cd=3&ved=0CCsQFjAC&usg=AFQjCNGioNme9hNfRTM97fKV8596TPyxzQ

    ReplyDelete
  28. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yqNwAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA249&lpg=PA249&dq=Rama+Nimrud&source=bl&ots=dnuypcOFuz&sig=YduB5VtK-6Bi-WRJByvTLUMAhD0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=c-PrUs7EJafR7AaT-oCIAw&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAw

    ReplyDelete
  29. Aryan blood came from Nefilim? Can be all bulshit! We don't know there is no proof! The first idea of Aryan (Noble) blood came from first Sumerians which were Sabaeans descent from first born son Saba of Ham. They are also known as Turanians or Scythic. They were very first people in Sumer after them came ancient Asyrians they join Kushitic Turanians became one nation of Sumer. Akkadian Asyrian spoken Semitic language and Akkadian Turanian spoken Sabaean language. Biblical Nimrod married Asyrians wife. Joktan brother of Pelag became first ruler of Semitic race he married to Nimruds daughter. Keturah concubine of Abraham was daughter of Nimrud. Abraham /Brahmin and Keturah /Kshatriya were ancestors of Midian /Gypsy. Roma gypsies descent from Rechabites they were descendants of midianite Jethro and Aron levite. Sinti Gypsies and Romanichel are descendats of Moses and midianite Ziporah which was daughter of Jethro. Roma gypsies and Sinti Gypsies and Romanichel are same people infact, because Aron and Moses were brothers and Jethro was Ziporah father. They can have same origin but they got different history. Rechabites lived in Israel till Nebucadnezar time. But Sinti they decent from biblical Balak son of Moses and Ziporah. He became king of Moab and later his family with other royal clans of Midian became Hyksos. They claim Apiru or Habiru or Abhiru descent and it was right because they were Hebrew. Also they claim Kenite origin also this was right because Kenite =Midian. Hyksos after they lost everything in Egypt they came back to Israel. They managed intermarried to Levites and to Juda royal. They were excepted in Israel because they were descendants of Moses. Zoroaster founder of Achaemenid dynasty and Anshan Kingdom in Elam, was from Hyksos royal or Midian /Gypsy. Zoroaster was descent from Balak which was son of Moses. Zoroastrianism was cannanite Baalism in fact they change just names. Read Jeremiah 49:34 prophesy about Elam. Jeremiah wrote that 600 BC -580BC in that time was already Anshan Kingdom in Elam so prophecy belong to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous, what you said is bullshit. The Kenites do not equal Midianites.

      Delete
  30. Saba was first born son of Kush not Ham sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Keturah was daughter of Joktan and grandchild of Nimrud. Sorry

    ReplyDelete
  32. Jethro was Kenite. Kenites were one of clan of Midian!

    ReplyDelete
  33. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=p4RDVOX1Dq7d7Qarx4CgCw&url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9279-kenites&ved=0CEIQFjAM&usg=AFQjCNETYDTUQctUGye_6IpM86-bGuq9Eg

    ReplyDelete
  34. Look for Midian children!
    https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=Xd1WVMGiCoTB7AaC3IDYDA&url=http://fabpedigree.com/s068/f017776.htm&ved=0CB4QFjAB&usg=AFQjCNGfna_hLo7fH6HsMo-IAdlFJ5RKlQ

    ReplyDelete