Thursday, March 14, 2013
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Page In Progress (12/15/12)
(The above is a page in progress, as we slowly but surely approach the apocalypse--like a beast steadily lurching towards Jerusalem?)
There's this touchy, feely, warm and fuzzy Christianity going around, being pervasive. Somebody on Youtube pointed out that when a mature Christian calls out another "Christian" for being deceived or being a deceiver--other "Christians" will say that we are to love one another. This is Luciferianism disguised as Christianity, which says that we must accept all sorts of wrong teachings and opinions within the body of Christ. What many Christians must realize is that speaking the truth is showing love. Of course we should be to the point when we speak forth the truth but also have the attitude of wanting to help somebody come out of deception.
"1Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? 4If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. 5I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? 6But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers." (1 Corinthians 6)
(When it comes to settling disputes within the church, those who are the least respected should be called to preside over such matters. Doesn't happen very much today in such cases, I suspect.)
On the other hand, going around being holier than thou and accusing the brethren (so that we can look more righteous) is totally wrong. As Jesus says in Matthew 7:1-5, “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.”
There is a difference between the two kinds of judgment: the first kind being the right kind of judgment and the second kind being the wrong kind of judgment.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
The Story Continues (12/12/12)
Jesus Christ was YHVH Elohim--or Adonay YHVH--in the Old Testament. Kabbalah says that YHVH is the ineffable name. That cannot be: it was speakable, since the voice in the burning bush told Moses that the name he was to give to the Israelites was YHVH Elohim--translated "The LORD God" by the King James translators in Genesis 3:15. That was Jesus' voice in the burning bush.
Now onto the issue of the "man of sin" being a Muslim (supposedly). Where, O Man, does it say in the scriptures that the Antichrist will arise from among the Muslim nations? He's called "Gog" in Ezekiel 38-39. And where does Gog come from? The north!
By the way, I've heard that the US is sending fighter jets to Egypt. I see that Egypt will be the first of the three horns (Daniel 7:8) that the Antichrist will overcome. Gog being the "king of the north" and Egypt being the "king of the south" in Daniel 11. However, what is up first will be the Daniel 8 War, as I've said. Very few Bible teachers or Bible scholars point this out.
Monday, December 10, 2012
The Story Continues (12/8/12)
Anyway, getting back to the above quote. The Northern Tribes, after they were deported and scattered, no longer observed the feasts given to their fathers by Moses. Likewise they quit observing the sabbaths. But then the Israelites of the Northern Kingdom stopped observing the sabbaths and the feast days once they broke away from the House of David (earlier).
It's been said that Israel--God's chosen people--are the ones who maintain the world we live in, by way of them imagining this world. And thus they sustain it. 1 Chronicles 29:17-18 says: "I know also, my God, that thou triest the heart, and hast pleasure in uprightness...O LORD God of Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel, our fathers, keep this for ever in the imagination of the thoughts of the heart of thy people, and prepare their heart unto thee." Well, the Israelites today are not using their imagination for "uprightness," for the most part. And they and the rest of the world are suffering severely because of this. The Anglo-Saxons--the foremost of Israel--are for the most part engulfed in great deception.
Anyway moving onto one Israelite author who really isn't helping, notwithstanding his superb ability as a writer. Grant Morrison has an understanding of Genesis 1 and John 1. I think he demonstrates this with a mini-series he wrote called "Final Crisis." This story seems to be the apocalypse for the DC Comics universe (multiverse). It ends with Superman saving the day by singing a song.
The universe began with sound frequency: words uttered by God, causing creation to come into existence. The Word was there in the beginning of creation. All of creation, Morrison is saying, is constructed from sound. According to Wikipedia, at the end of "Final Crisis," Superman is surrounded by darkness as he confronts the villain, Darkseid.
Just as verse 2 of Genesis 1 is the aftermath of the First War in Heaven: the earth was in chaos, and darkness was over the deep waters. Then God spoke and light appeared. "...and God divided the light from the darkness." (Gen. 1:3) This is a reflection of the spiritual: light and darkness cannot mix. "And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." (John 1:5)
And as Paul says in 2 Corinthians 6:14-15, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?"
Thursday, December 6, 2012
The Story Continues (12/6/12)
It's been said that we've been transitioning out of the Age of Pisces and into the Age of Aquarius. Supposedly this period of transition began in 1845 and will end around 2200--when we will be in Aquarius proper. 2012 is the midpoint.
It looks like we will soon see the Daniel 8 war begin (once more). And a few years down the line--after the deceptive peace--the Ezekiel 38 (also Daniel 11) war will take place. That is the war in which the "man of sin" will come to his end. Could it be that "the rest of the beasts...prolonged for a season and time" (Daniel 7:12) is speaking of those "beasts" or nations who were (from a future perspective) allied with the Antichrist--having survived armageddon--will finally be dealt with around the point where the Piscean age officially ends and the Aquarian age officially begins? And Revelation 19:21--"the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse"--is speaking of the same thing?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)