Page In Progress (12/15/12)

(The above is a page in progress, as we slowly but surely approach the apocalypse--like a beast steadily lurching towards Jerusalem?)

There's this touchy, feely, warm and fuzzy Christianity going around, being pervasive.  Somebody on Youtube pointed out that when a mature Christian calls out another "Christian" for being deceived or being a deceiver--other "Christians" will say that we are to love one another.  This is Luciferianism disguised as Christianity, which says that we must accept all sorts of wrong teachings and opinions within the body of Christ.  What many Christians must realize is that speaking the truth is showing love.  Of course we should be to the point when we speak forth the truth but also have the attitude of wanting to help somebody come out of deception.

  "1Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? 2Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? 3Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life? 4If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church. 5I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? 6But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers." (1 Corinthians 6)

(When it comes to settling disputes within the church, those who are the least respected should be called to preside over such matters.  Doesn't happen very much today in such cases, I suspect.)

On the other hand, going around being holier than thou and accusing the brethren (so that we can look more righteous) is totally wrong.  As Jesus says in Matthew 7:1-5, “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged; and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.”

There is a difference between the two kinds of judgment: the first kind being the right kind of judgment and the second kind being the wrong kind of judgment.

The Story Continues (12/12/12)

 

 Jesus Christ was YHVH Elohim--or Adonay YHVH--in the Old Testament.  Kabbalah says that YHVH is the ineffable name.  That cannot be: it was speakable, since the voice in the burning bush told Moses that the name he was to give to the Israelites was YHVH Elohim--translated "The LORD God" by the King James translators in Genesis 3:15.  That was Jesus' voice in the burning bush.

 

Now onto the issue of the "man of sin" being a Muslim (supposedly).  Where, O Man, does it say in the scriptures that the Antichrist will arise from among the Muslim nations?  He's called "Gog" in Ezekiel 38-39.  And where does Gog come from?  The north!

 

By the way, I've heard that the US is sending fighter jets to Egypt.  I see that Egypt will be the first of the three horns (Daniel 7:8) that the Antichrist will overcome.  Gog being the "king of the north" and Egypt being the "king of the south" in Daniel 11.  However, what is up first will be the Daniel 8 War, as I've said.  Very few Bible teachers or Bible scholars point this out.      

The Story Continues (12/8/12)

Hosea 2:11 says, "I will also cause all her mirth to cease, her feast days, her new moons, and her sabbaths, and all her solemn feasts."  God is speaking of Scattered Israel, whose identity has been lost to them: Anglo-Saxons, Welsh, Scottish, French, Germans, Norwegians, Swedes, Danes, Dutch, Belgians, Italians, Greeks, Spanish, Austrians, Swiss and some others.  They need to wake up.  It's sad that only a remnant of them will do so.  The vast majority of them will take part in this ever-growing apostasy--culminating in them partaking of the strong delusion that God will send them, because they have no love for the truth.  Sad indeed.

Anyway, getting back to the above quote.  The Northern Tribes, after they were deported and scattered, no longer observed the feasts given to their fathers by Moses.  Likewise they quit observing the sabbaths.  But then the Israelites of the Northern Kingdom stopped observing the sabbaths and the feast days once they broke away from the House of David (earlier).

It's been said that Israel--God's chosen people--are the ones who maintain the world we live in, by way of them imagining this world.  And thus they sustain it.  1 Chronicles 29:17-18 says: "I know also, my God, that thou triest the heart, and hast pleasure in uprightness...O LORD God of Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel, our fathers, keep this for ever in the imagination of the thoughts of the heart of thy people, and prepare their heart unto thee."  Well, the Israelites today are not using their imagination for "uprightness," for the most part.  And they and the rest of the world are suffering severely because of this.  The Anglo-Saxons--the foremost of Israel--are for the most part engulfed in great deception.     

Anyway moving onto one Israelite author who really isn't helping, notwithstanding his superb ability as a writer.  Grant Morrison has an understanding of Genesis 1 and John 1.  I think he demonstrates this with a mini-series he wrote called "Final Crisis."  This story seems to be the apocalypse for the DC Comics universe (multiverse).  It ends with Superman saving the day by singing a song. 

The universe began with sound frequency: words uttered by God, causing creation to come into existence.  The Word was there in the beginning of creation.  All of creation, Morrison is saying, is constructed from sound.  According to Wikipedia, at the end of "Final Crisis," Superman is surrounded by darkness as he confronts the villain, Darkseid. 

Just as verse 2 of Genesis 1 is the aftermath of the First War in Heaven: the earth was in chaos, and darkness was over the deep waters.  Then God spoke and light appeared.  "...and God divided the light from the darkness."  (Gen. 1:3)  This is a reflection of the spiritual: light and darkness cannot mix.  "And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." (John 1:5)

And as Paul says in 2 Corinthians 6:14-15, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?" 
 

The Story Continues (12/6/12)

It's been said that we've been transitioning out of the Age of Pisces and into the Age of Aquarius.  Supposedly this period of transition began in 1845 and will end around 2200--when we will be in Aquarius proper.  2012 is the midpoint.

 

It looks like we will soon see the Daniel 8 war begin (once more).  And a few years down the line--after the deceptive peace--the Ezekiel 38 (also Daniel 11) war will take place.  That is the war in which the "man of sin" will come to his end.  Could it be that "the rest of the beasts...prolonged for a season and time" (Daniel 7:12) is speaking of those "beasts" or nations who were (from a future perspective) allied with the Antichrist--having survived armageddon--will finally be dealt with around the point where the Piscean age officially ends and the Aquarian age officially begins?  And Revelation 19:21--"the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse"--is speaking of the same thing? 

The Story Continues (12/2/12)

 

Daniel 7:12 says, "As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time."  Who are these beasts?  What we can discern is that they are the remnant of the beast army of the Antichrist--once he is obliterated from this earthly realm.

 

Let's look at Revelation 20 once more.  As I've said previously the 2nd beast (of Rev. 13)--or "son of perdition--is not judged by God at the "great white throne" judgment:" "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone." (Rev. 19:20) 

 

Now it may be as Michael (shieldoftheson on Youtube) says, that Satan is bound up in the bottomless pit for a bit of time and then "cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever." (Rev. 20:10)  So when it says, "And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh:" (Rev. 19:21) this may occur a bit later, once the beast army is beaten and the Antichrist has already been flung--still alive (as stated above)--into the lake of fire.  It appears that this remnant is also referred to in Ezekiel 39:1-4: "Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel..."  It may be that the "sixth part" that is spared is the "rest of the beasts" of Daniel 7:12 who are allowed to live for a short time.  Michael is saying that the thousand years may actually be way shorter than a literal thousand years (time in the 4th and higher dimensions--that is in heaven--being different than time in our 3-D realm).

 

Ezekiel 39:7 says, "So will I make my holy name known in the midst of my people Israel; and I will not let them pollute my holy name any more: and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel."  This is speaking mainly of Manasseh (USA), though Ephraim (England) and the rest of scattered Israel are spoken of too.

 

Psalm 83:3 says: "They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones."  Zionist Christians are saying that we are about to see Psalm 83 fulfilled: Iran, Syria and Hamas joining in an attack on the State of Israel (supposedly).  But who are the "hidden ones"?  Who else but the scattered Israelites?  Anglo-Saxons (USA and the British Commonwealth of Nations) and those of most other European nations whose identity as Israelites is "hidden."

The Story Continues (11/22/12)

 

It may be that when Francis Bacon and his friends shaped the English language--the King James Version of the Bible--that came down to us, Bacon simultaneously transmitting the truth to us from the original languages (Hebrew and Greek) and also obfuscating at the same time.  The English language is equivocal.  There are many words that have multiple meanings.  The word "love" has different shades of meaning, unlike in the Greek where you have different words for the specific kinds of love: agape being the greatest form of love, which only God can express.  And especially today people are turned off from reading the KJV Bible because the language is too archaic, in their eyes.

 

Bacon, being an occultist, knew that Satan attempts to counterfeit God.  (Therefore Satan is obligated to tell people what he intends to do before he does it.)  This is how God operates, as Amos 3:7 says, "Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets."  And so Bacon was compelled to transmit the truth via the Authorized Version of the Bible, but he--since he was a servant of Satan--sought to make the truth difficult to grasp.  For example, Zionism is of the antichrist spirit.  Yet many "Christians" today--especially those in the USA--are Zionist "Christians."  This sad state of affairs is not wholly the result of the (seeming) obliqueness of the Authorized Version or the KJV.  The wicked ones foisting on the people all these other modern (corrupt) Bible versions have also played a major role in the great deception and apostasy--such as the NIV, the Message, etc.  

 

Going back to the equivocality thing what really makes the equivocalness of the English language drive one to exasperation can be: how the word "repent" is used in the Bible, concerning God himself.  Genesis 6:6 says, "And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."  Yet in Deuteronomy 23:19 we have: "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?"  Perhaps this was done to confuse people?  Certainly in Gen. 6:6 the LORD is not actually repenting of his creation of man.  After all, the Father sent his only begotten Son to be born as a man.  "45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 46Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 47The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven." (1 Corinthians 15) 

 

 

 

The Story Continues (11/20/12)

 

These days the attack against the the Apostle Paul is stronger than ever (part of the "falling away" that he spoke of).  One way people discredit him is with the two recountings--in the Book of Acts--of his conversion experience on the road to Damascus.  Acts 9:7 says, "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."  In Acts 22:9 we have: "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."  An apparent contradiction?  Not really.  In the first verse "voice" means that Saul's (Paul) companions heard the voice of an unseen man but could not discern the words of said man--as the second verse indicates.

 

We see that Genesis 3:8 says, "And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden."  Here "voice" must mean the sound that the LORD God was making as he made his way through the garden.  For the next verse (9) tells us, "And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?"  Clearly the Creator did not speak until Genesis 3:9.