The Trojan War: 874-864 BC ?

 

There is a theory that moves the date of the Trojan War from 1184-1174 BC (set by Eratosthenes) further down to 874-864 BC.  This makes more sense to me. 

 

The Etruscans were Trojans who had fled the destruction of Troy.  Their land of Etruria--to the north of Rome and Latium--came into being circa 700 BC.  And then there's the fact that both Etruria and Troy have the TR root in them.  That's telling, I think.

 

A historian named Timaeus moved the founding of Rome down to 814 BC.  In light of the later dating of the Trojan War, this makes sense.

 

Now there's a problem, and it has to do with the Dorians.  If it is true that the Dorians were Danites who left Israel in the days of the Judges--which would have occurred closer to the older date of the Trojan War (12th cent. BC)--then they (Dorians) could not have come into Greece Proper before 864 BC.  How do we resolve this?

 

Well, we could do so by saying that these Danites or Dorians did leave the Levant in the 12th cent. BC.  They migrated westward, making their way across Anatolia and crossing over into Thracia.  Or more likely they went around the Black Sea, for the Hittite Empire would have been a formidable power at this time.  The Dorians may also have arrived in Greece by ship. 

 

When the Dorians arrived, they pretty much settled in the northern frontier (later known as Macedonia) of the lower Greek lands (Peloponnese, Attica, Aetolia, etc.).  By the time of the aftermath of the Trojan War--the collapse of Achaean or Danaan society--many Dorians moved in.  The Achaeans, except for those of Athens, evacuated the Greek cities--eventually moving up the Danube River into Northwest Europe.  The Dorians moved in to fill the vacuum.  They became, for the most part, the Greeks of the classical era.     

The Tree of Life

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is symbolic of turning to Satan. It is also symbolic of acquiring dark knowledge--of the seeking of "hidden" knowledge (Gnosticism, which has its greatest form in the Jewish Kabalah).

Mahabharata and Advent of Last of the Anunnaki

"The Astika describes the birth of Garuda and of the Nagas (snakes), the churning of the ocean, the incidents relating to the birth of the celestial steed Uchchaihsrava, and finally, the dynasty of Bharata, as described in the Snake-sacrifice of king Janamejaya." (Mahabharata, Book I, Section II)  The above quote appears to speak of the origin of the Rama civilization (circa 15,000 BC ?)  In one of his books Mr. Churchward said that a people called the Nagas fled the sinking island continent of Mu.  Then it can be inferred that they sought refuge in India, eventually founding the Rama Empire in northern India.  Rama was one of the last rulers of said civilization--already in decline.  (It is interesting to note that the word Naga is similar in sound and meaning to "Nachash," the Hebrew word that was translated as "serpent" in the Bible (KJV).  Draw what conclusion you will from that, but neither Nagas or the Nachash could be literally serpentine.  Rama and his people were human.  The Nachash (Satan) was an angel: that is he was like Adam, a white guy--and the former was a "shining one.")

The Mahabharata recounts a time further on from the Ramayana--the "interval" (a time being 5561 BC?) between the preceding transition (from the Treta Yuga to the Dwapara Yuga) and the following transition (from the DwaparaYuga to the Kali Yuga).  This time witnessed a further decline from the Ramayana (Treta Yuga, a Silver Age), itself a decline from the days of Atlantis or Tripura (Satya Yuga, a Golden Age).  (The text says that the Mahabharata war was fought in the "interval" between the Dwapara Yuga and the Kali Yuga.  You be the judge of what "interval" means.)      

The following quote is also from Book One, Section II of the Mahabharata, "...the wanderings of Arjuna of immeasurable prowess in search of weapons; his battle with Mahadeva in the guise of a hunter; his meeting with the lokapalas and receipt of weapons from them; his journey to the regions of Indra for arms." This suggests to me that Arjuna went north to the Himalayas and even further north--for Indra had to be a storm god that came originally from the first Aryan homeland of Hyperborea (the Arctic Region), where blizzards blew--going back to the latter days of the last Ice Age (15,000 BC?) and maybe even further back to the antecedent interglacial (127,000-110,000 BC).)

(Some dude named Mooneyham says that in Tibet and Western China were/are secret hangars housing vimana--the aircraft of the glorious days of the Rama Empire.  Maybe Arjuna was searching for these also.)

The story I'm beginning to see from my research is this: the descent from the golden age to the bronze age saw the use of such destructive weapons--even atomic weapons.  Witness the following description of the Mahabharata conflict: “The heavens cried out, the earth bellowed an answer, lightening flashed forth, fire flamed upwards, it rained down death. The brightness vanished, the fire was extinguished. Everyone who was struck by the lightening was turned to ashes”.  Yet another description reads, “It was a ghastly sight to see. The corpses of the fallen were so mutilated they no longer looked like human beings. Never before have we seen such an awful weapon, and never before have we heard of such a weapon.”

In the wake of such horror and mass slayings Yahveh Elohim placed an Anunnaki couple, who were ruddy and called Adam and Eve, in the garden in Eden (4004 BC).  "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.  But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground." (Genesis 2:4-6)

(To be continued in the next post, hopefully--where I intend to address the claim that the Iliad is a swipe of Indian epics such as the Ramayana, which is not true!  All these epic poems are Aryan ultimately--the overarching pageant of the Aryans/Adamites, as they moved westward.)

"Wilusa" and "Troy"

I've read on a website (I forget the website and I'm too lazy to dig up which one it was.) that the Aramaic (root) word for "tower" is TWR.  We should remember that Aramaic was the northwestern branch of the Aryan/Akkadian family of languages...actually I've found the site and the specific page: http://www.biblebabel.net/trojans-and-etruscans-who-were-they.php

Very interesting what they have to say.  The people who created this site are not Christians, yet what they say here lends support to what the Bible and true history has to say.  (I checked into what they assert and am convinced that they are very much on the path of verity in this regard.)

Apparently TWR is the root from which "Troy" is derived.  So "Troy" refers to the citadel.

In a recent post I posited the theory that YHWD (part of an inscription on the Bat Creek stone and which means "Yehudah" or "Judah"--removing the prefix "L" from LYHWD) was morphed into Wilusa.  I was wrong.  What we have here is that the root "WLY" is where "Wilusa" is derived from.  WLY means "to border upon."  From the same root comes "waliy," which means "ally."  I've heard somewhere that Paris (as the de facto ruler of Troy and using his political name "Alexander") was an ally of the Hittite Empire.

It's interesting that this article says that the Hittite "pariya-muwa" does not mean "Priam;"  Rather pariya-muwa means "Ephraim" or more likely "Abram."

Wil-USA and Jer-USA-lem have something in common. 

The Question of the Apostle Paul: the Lies and the Truth

It seems that many people are working to discredit the Apostle Paul.  These people appear to be evenly matched against each other on both sides: Christian and Atheist.  One way to paint Paul as a delusional zealot is by pointing out two ostensibly contradicting verses (in the Book of Acts)--that have to do with what actually happened during Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus (at that time when he was still known as Saul).  Acts 9:7 (KJV) says, "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."  Acts 22:9 (KJV) says, "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me." 

I just came upon a website (www.ffrf.org), which belongs to Freedom from Religion Foundation.  This is where I read an article by Dan Barker--in which he says that it is indisputable that Acts 9:7 contradicts Acts 22:9.  Barker says that "they heard not" ("ouk ekousan" in the Greek) cannot be interpreted as Saul describing his companions' inability to understand the voice that they're hearing (Acts 22:9). 

Barker does not explain that there's one way of understanding: when you hear (clearly perceive) words uttered by somebody, which you may or may not comprehend in terms of the choice of words and/or their ordering.  That is you discern a string of words, but you cannot understand the meaning that the speaker is trying to convey with said words.  And there's another way of understanding: when you hear someone's voice, but the sounds they're making are unintelligible: you cannot discern any meaningful words--from the sounds uttered by the voice.  (Which is the case with Paul's companions when he was converted on the road to Damascus, as is explained in verse 9 of Acts 22.) 

Thus Barker is saying that what Paul recounts--when he says in Acts 22:9 that his companions "heard not the voice of him that" spoke to him--is that his fellow travelers did not hear the voice; this would then not corroborate the account given in chapter 9 (verse 7 specifically).

Barker says that he confronted a certain "Christian apologist," named James White, about this apparent contradiction.  According to Barker, White replied that since the Greek word "phone" (FONAY)--that is translated as "voice" in the King James Version of both Acts 9:7 and Acts 22:9--is in two different cases in each verse; then "phone" does not mean "voice" in both verses.  In Acts 9:7 "phone" ("voice" in the KJV) is in the genitive case (which shows possession and can also show a relationship to the verb ("hearing") for which it is the object), then it must be translated as "sound."  Whereas in Acts 22:9 "phone" ("voice" in the KJV) is in the accusative case (which means that the verbal ("heard not") is saying something specific about the voice and should be understood as meaning "voice."  (That is Saul's companions could not discern any kind of comprehensible words from the utterance by the voice.) 

And according to Barker, White is wrong when he says that "phone" in the genitive case should be translated as "sound," and "phone" in the accusative case should be translated as "voice."  In saying that White is wrong, Barker is right (in this).  The Greek "phone" cannot be translated as two different words (in the English) just because they have two different cases: the genitive in Acts 9:7 ("phones") and the accusative in Acts 22:9 ("phonen"). 

As for James White, I've encountered some of his videos on Youtube.  What I've seen about him is that he says a lot of gibberish--a lot of bullshit.  He's a fraud: a wolf in sheep's clothing.  What we have here then--concerning both Dan Barker (and the FFRF) and Christian apologists like James White--is a case of controlled opposition, where both of them are working the opposite sides in a dispute (and where neither of them are being totally upfront).  But both of them serve the same master, that being Mammon.  They are both playing a game (divide and conquer).  The object of this game is to cause confusion for those who are honestly seeking the truth.

Barker says that two modern versions of the Bible (the New International Version and the Living Bible) translate "phones" in Acts 9:7 as "sound."  In doing so the translators for these two versions are attempting to (subtly) discredit Paul (and by extension Luke, who wrote the Book of Acts).  The translators are also attempting to add confusion to this matter, making it more difficult to sift through this thing that is already complicated--because of having to look into the Greek, if you want to go all the way with finding out the truth.  Therefore the modern translators [except for those who worked on the New Revised Standard Version (in this case)] are being disingenuous.  

Minoans, Achaeans, and Trojans (Part I)

 

In a previous post (on the Achaeans, Trojans, and Minoans) I stated that the Trojans and the Minoans were related.  The earliest "Minoans" (whose civilization on the island of Crete was established about 2600 BC) were of Semitic stock.  Which is appropriate, since Noah prophesied this about Shem (one of his three sons): "And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.  God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant."  (Genesis 9:26-27)

 

The early Minoans were most likely matriarchal.  They most likely came from the city of Tyre.  It was not until Darda, a grandson of Judah (by way of Zerah), and his group of Judahites, arrived on the island--that the Minoan kingdom became a great power in the Eastern Mediterranean.

 

   1 Kings 4:31 says of Solomon, "For he was wiser than all men; than Ethan, the Ezrahite, and Heman, and Calcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol; and his fame was in all nations round about."  Solomon was the wisest man ever, being knowledgeable in a number of areas.  To say that David's son was wiser than Darda, Calcol, Heman, and Ethan--it must being saying a lot about the latter: they were quite wise themselves.  And no doubt they possessed much knowledge.

 

Then it can be said that Darda is the one responsible for developing the language of the Minoans--called "Linear A"--that remains undeciphered to this day.  And it may very well be that Darda was the mastermind behind the giant robot--named "Talos"--that circled the island of Crete three times a day, ever vigilant for hostile warships from jealous neighboring kingdoms.  After all the Minoan cities--the capital of Knossos and the other towns--were unwalled.  These later Minoans (once Darda and his Judahites took over and made Minoan society into a patriarchical one) were confident in the deterrence afforded by their robotic defender and their impressive navy.

 

 

 

LYHWD (For Yehudah or Judah)=Wilusa?

The Bat Creek stone appears--to me anyway--to be authentic.  The longest word in the inscription says (transliterated from the Hebrew): "LYHWD."  Which actually reads from right to left (since Hebrew does read from right to left) and translated into English means, "for Judah or Yehudah."  "L" is the Hebrew prefix in the dative case (preposition) for "for."

It dates from anywhere between the 1st century AD to the 8th cent. AD.  It was found in what we know today as the state of Tennessee.  Now this is a wild theory, but I'll put it forth anyway.

Now King Arthur II led a party of Britons (Welsh) to N. America in 574 AD.  This date fits within the timeframe of the possible date of the Bat Creek stone.  Arthur's fleet returned to Britain four years later (with his embalmed body, for he had been killed by hostile natives).  I understand that Arthur II's younger brother, Madoc, died in Tennessee and was buried there.  The thing is this: Arthur and his people were descended from Trojans who settled in Britain a few generations after the Trojan War ( circa 1185 BC).  And the Trojans were of the tribe of Judah.

Could it be that Arthur and his fellow Britons knew that they--being of Trojan blood--knew that they were of the tribe of Judah? 

We know that one name for the Troy of Homer's Iliad was "Wilusa."  Could Wilusa be another way of saying Yehudah?  That is--another way of saying YHWD?  Which closely resembles YHVH, the name that Moses was told by the God of Israel to take to his kindred.
 

  

Psalms 110:1: Jesus Christ is Yahveh

About five days ago, I left a comment on a Restoration Fellowship (Dr. Anthony Buzzard) video, in which the question of two Yahvehs is dealt with.  In my comment I explained that superficially there appears to be two Yahvehs.  In actuality there is only one Yahveh, as Deuteronomy 6:4 says, "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD..."  I said that Jesus Christ is Yahveh.

On his videos Buzzard has set his comments section to approval pending.  That raises a red flag with me.  So far my comment has not shown up.  The truth is being suppressed or attacked all over Youtube--and all over the internet for that matter.

Psalms 110:1: Yahweh at the Right Hand

The transliteration of Psalms 110:1 reads:

"1 l'däwid miz'môr n'um y'hwäh ladoniy shëv liymiyniy ad-äshiyt oy'veykhä hádom l'rag'leykhä"

Let's break it down:

"l'dawid miz'mor n'um" (David poem oracle)

"y'hwah" (Yahweh or Yahveh)

"ladoniy" [which is la (to) + adown (rule or sovereign)] (to rule)

"shev" [which is a form of yashab] (sit, dwell, remain)

"liymiyniy" [which is le (regarding or according to) + yamiyn (right hand)] according to the right hand (of somebody more powerful)

And here I want to stop. 

 

Jesus Christ and the Idea of Avatars

The idea of avatars--the physical manifestations of Vishnu (2nd person of the Hindu trinity)--seems similar to the truth that Jesus Christ is the image of the God of Jacob (Israel).  We know that Rama and Krishna have both been appearances of Vishnu here on earth: Rama during the Treta Yuga (circa 7400 BC?) and Krishna during the Dwapara Yuga (5561 BC?)

Vishnu seems to be equivalent to Jesus.  The parallel is equivocal.  For Rama--being the 2nd person in the trinity he belongs to--has taken ostensibly human form in the ancient past.  Jesus, on the other hand, is the avatar (if you will) of YHVH Elohim.  (Since no (Adamic) man has known God, except through the Son--Jesus Christ.)

It then may be safely concluded that Vishnu is a corruption of the truth--that Jesus Christ is God come down to his own--that is, to Adamic man. 

As for Brahma--the creator and 1st person of the trinity that he is a part of--he is the corollary of Vishnu: the former is (equivocally) the Hindu version of YHVH--the Father.  Psalm 110: 1 says, "{A Psalm of David.} The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool."  In the original Hebrew (check it out at qbible.com) it appears to say that Yahveh should sit at the right hand of (who other than?) Yahveh until... 

Thus the picture of God painted by Hinduism (and the Vedic texts) does not present the full truth about the true God--the most High.  

The Bible: Meant for Israel Only

 

"Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! When God bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad." (Psalms 53:6)  This Old Testament verse says that God came to the earth--as Jesus Christ--to save Israel.

 

The Greek word translated as "world" in John 3:16--"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life"--is "kosmon."  Which is a form of the word "kosmos."  This word, in the context of the Bible, means this: the ordering or configuration of believers, who are of (scattered) Israel and also of the remnant of Judah who never lost their identity.

 

You might have guessed that "kosmos" is where we get the English "cosmos."  Now cosmos means the stars in the heaven above.  Thus kosmos must mean the stars (angels, sons of God, annunaki (in the Sumerian)) that fell. 

 

Ephesians 1:4 says, "...According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love..."  "Kataboles kosmou" are the Greek words that the King James translators translated as "the foundation of the world."  The ancient Greeks (Achaian, Dorian, Ionians and Aeolians) were part of the kosmos.  And so were the other scattered Israelites (of Europe).  So the kosmos are the elect--are Israel.

 

Katabole means: a throwing down or a falling down.  In the previous age of the earth--when Lucifer led a third of the elect angels in rebellion against the most High--these who are of the kosmos or Israel were the elect angels.  And some if not all of them were those one third who were deceived by the Devil into joining in his rebellion against YHVH Elohim.

Atlantis, Rama, Egyptians, the Kenites, and the Greeks

 

(The above drawing by Mike McMahon is from a comic book called "Slaine," written by Pat Mills.)

 

 

"The transactions of this our city of Sais, are recorded in our sacred writings during a period of 8,000 years." — PLATO: Timaeus

 

The last golden age of Atlantis (and of the world over all) ended in the 10th millennium BC--when Atlantis sank circa 9,600 BC. 

 

Moving forward to the 8th millennium BC when Rama fought his war against a "demon" named Ravana.  Rama was the victor, so he would get to write the official history (via Valmiki) of this event.  Could it be that Hanuman the Monkey King was a Kenite?  Or rather a proto-Kenite?  (Since this war predates the garden event by some 4,000 years.)  Rama appears to be another Christ figure--or rather another Antichrist figure.

 

 

Moving forward to the 1st millennium BC  we have Saul leading an Israelite army to attack the Amalekites.  1 Samuel 15:6 says, "And Saul said unto the Kenites, Go, depart, get you down from among the Amalekites, lest I destroy you with them: for ye shewed kindness to all the children of Israel, when they came up out of Egypt. So the Kenites departed from among the Amalekites."  We can conclude (from what the rest of the scriptures say) that the reason that the Kenites showed kindness to the Israelites was that they realized that one day Israel would come to dominate the region--and there was nothing nobody could do about it, for Yahweh was with them.  The Kenites knew prophecy.  They knew their time would come--which is today--and they would ride the coattails of Israel to world domination. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kenites Insinuate Themselves Into Israel

    (The guy with the black hair is a Kenite (more specifically of Edomite/Ashkenazi descent) and the guy with the mustache is of Manasseh (American of Anglo-Saxon descent.)

 

 

The Kenites knew that the two sons of Joseph--Ephraim and Manasseh--would be more blessed than their Israelite brethren.  The children of Ephraim (England) and Manasseh (USA) would come to have dominion over the world.  It's no wonder that the Bankers and lawyers (Kenites, broadly speaking) have made their headquarters in London.

 

But their aim is to make Jerusalem their (world) capital.  That's what this crescendo of created chaos in Syria is leading to--created by the Bankers (Synagogue of Satan/sons of Cain).

Origin of the Dorians

 

The Dorians who migrated into Achaean Greece (not long after the fall of the Achaean citadels) had to have come from Canaan.  (Before I proceed further, let me establish that these were white people; they were not Sub-Saharan (black) people.)

 

The Trojan War--like the Ramayana (circa 7400 BC? in the Treta Yuga) and the Mahabharata (5561 BC in the Dwapara Yuga)--is covered up in myth.  But myths have at least a core of truth to them.  The collapse of Achaean (Mycenaean) Greece occurred shortly after the fall of Troy circa 1185 BC. 

 

The Odyssey is about Odysseus' adventures he had while he and his men were making their way home (from Troy) to the island of Ithaca.  The Dorians first appear here (Book 19, Line 177)--as being the inhabitants of the island of Crete.  If anything Homer has been vindicated by archaeology concerning some of the things spoken of in the Iliad. 

 

The origin of the Dorians in the Levant is further attested to by the Apostle Paul's first letter to the Corinthians.  In chapter 10--verses 1 to 5--he says: "Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. 5But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness." 

 

Clearly Paul was stating that the Corinthian Christians (and by extension the other Corinthian Greeks) were descended from Dorian settlers.  Of course the Dorian immigrants arrived in Hellas a few centuries after the Exodus of Israel--under Moses' leadership--from their captivity in Egypt (circa 1450 BC).  Whereas the Achaean Greeks were descended from Judahite and Danite colonists who left Egypt before the Exodus (around 1600 BC); the Dorians were descended from Israelites who were part of the Exodus.  I'm of the opinion that the Dorians were Danites who sailed away from Ancient Israel in the days of the judges.  The island of Crete was a stopping point on their way to the Greek mainland.  Dan was a tribe that had an affinity for taking to the sea in ships.

 

The four Greek tribes were: Achaeans, Dorians, Aeolians, and Ionians.  It may be that the Ionians--unlike the other three tribes--were not Israelites.  They were of the larger grouping of Aryan (White) people.  Throughout the centuries the Scattered Israelites received infusions from other surrounding peoples--who were also Caucasians.  All these peoples--including the Israelites (who are the Elect or God's chosen people)--were/are the descendants of Adam and Eve by way of Seth and then Noah and his three sons: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. 

Aryans=Noble

 

The Rig Veda does not speak of an origin for the Aryans outside of India.  This can be explained, I think.  The later Aryans--descendants of Noah--of course came from north of the Himalayas.  The earliest Aryans were a darker-skinned people whose habitation of India goes back many millennia--perhaps all the way back to the Last Glacial Maximum or LGM for short (25,000 BC).  The LGM saw the transition from the descending Kali Yuga into the ascending Kali Yuga: which appears to be what we are in right now: the ascending Kali Yuga. 

 

It is said that the Rig Veda goes back into the Ice Age--13,000 BC and even earlier.  It finishes in the Treta Yuga--about 7400 BC, which was in the days of the Ramayana.  And this was nearly a millennium before the Mahabharata (in the Dwapara Yuga, which was in 5561 BC).

Calvinists in Britain

Kali Yuga Correlates to Genesis

 

Dr. Vartak, a Mahabharata scholar, states that the Kali Yuga began earlier than 3102 BC--he puts it as early as 4218 BC to 4597 BC.  The date of 4218 BC is close to the beginning of the transitional period into the descending Kali Yuga (3976 BC).  This in turn is close to 4004 BC, which may very well have been when Yahveh Elohim placed Adam and Eve in the garden in Eden.

 

And it is about 4000 BC when Sumeria experienced devastating flooding, known as the Flandrian Transgression.  This put an end to Ubaid culture--the Ubaids being pre-Adamite people.  Thus this was preparing the way for the Akkadian/Aryan people to arrive and establish a city called Babel in the plain of Shinar.  And it would be from these people--from the city of Ur--that Abram and Sarai would be called out by YHVH to Canaan.

 

Note that the descending Kali Yuga ended in 976 BC.  The transition period into the ascending Kali Yuga was from 976 BC to 676 BC.  What happened in this interval of time?  Why something major: the Assyrian captivity of the Northern Kingdom of Israel (the "Lost Ten Tribes of Israel")--in which God divorced the northern tribes.  This deportation included most of the Southern Kingdom of Judah.

 

Eventually captive Israel lost their identity.  Since then this has been the world's greatest secret.  And the Zionists want to keep this secret hidden.

 

The Babylonian Captivity of the Judahites (605 BC to 539 BC) occurred in the ascending Kali Yuga.  It was a dark time for God's Elect.  It was in these centuries (and for some time to come) that Scattered Israel (northern tribes) would be steeped in paganism until the light of the Gospel reached them in Europe in the 1st Century AD--by way of the Apostle Paul.  (Joseph of Arimathea was already in Britain at the time, teaching the Britons about The Way.) 

Mahabharata and Days of Noah

 

It may be that the beginning of the Kali Yuga (3102 BC) is connected to the birth of Lamech (father of Noah)--which is said to have occurred in 3103 BC.  And then the flood of Noah happened later (circa 2400 BC or there about).  This would make allowance for Yahveh Elohim putting Adam in the garden in 4004 BC. 

 

The name "Lamech" may be a combination of the Hebrew prefix "le" (meaning "to" or "towards") and the Hebrew verb "muk" (meaning "low" or "depressed").  Thus "Lamech" most likely means: "towards a lowering" or "for a lowering"--the same way that "le" in "l'nephesh" (Genesis 2:7) means "for a living soul."

 

Then it could be said that the Kali Yuga--an age in which men would love evil (would love the things of this world more than the things of God)--began very near the birth of Lamech--whose birth signified the advent of this lowered age of darkness which we find ourselves in.  It's also interesting to note that Lamech lived to be 777 years old.  This too must be symbolic--of the perfection of Adamic man?  Well, we know that the bloodline from Adam to Noah was pure: the line through which Jesus Christ would come was pure.

 

According to Mahabharata scholar Vartak the Kali Yuga is not mentioned at all in the Mahabharat epic.  In the poem it is noted that the time was approaching Kali, that the 18 day war of Kurukshetra (Northern India) took place in the evening of Dwapara Yuga, the yuga preceding the Kali Yuga.  (Apparently it goes like this: 1) Satya Yuga (golden age), 2) Treta Yuga (silver age), 3) Dwapara Yuga (bronze age) and 4) Kali Yuga (dark age).)

 

It is said that each yuga lasts 3,000 years and that the last 300 years of each is a transitional period.  A yuga cycle lasts 24,000 years--with the first 12,000 years descending from the Satya Yuga to the Kali Yuga--and with the last 12,000 years ascending from another (adjacent) ascending Kali Yuga to the Satya Yuga (again).  The current yuga cycle began in 12676 BC, when the earth was still in a major ice age (though the ice had begun to thaw).

 

According to this model the flood of Atlantis occurred in the transitional period of the descending Satya Yuga--that is the Atlantis flood occurred circa 9600 BC--76 years before the (descending) Treta Yuga began.  And according to this model we are in the ascending Kali Yuga, which will end in 2025 CE. 

 

 

According to this model the Mahabharata War (5561 BC) occurred 1,115 years after the beginning of the (descending) Dwapara Yuga.  And 5561 BC was 1,885 years before the end of this descending Dwapara Yuga. 

 

The Atlantis flood occurred within the descending Satya Yuga, and the Mahabharata war took place within the descending Dwapara Yuga.  The return of Jesus Christ will occur within the ascending Kali Yuga--which follows the descending Kali Yuga ushered in by the birth of Lamech (meaning "towards a lowering"). 

 

Kali Yuga Begins: Days of Noah

 

The Kali Yuga, contrary to the more popular belief, did not commence with the death of Krishna.  For the Mahabharat war took place (for 18 days--October 16 to November 4) in 5561 BC.  And Krishna died 36 years later in 5525 BC.  Marine archaeologist S. R. Rao determined that the sunken city (first of seven such cities called) Dwarka was between 9,500 to 7,500 years old.  This underwater site consists of parallel and perpendicular structures that are megalithic.  (For sure it was a heroic age.)  That would put it in the ballpark range of 5561 BC (for Mahabharat). 

 

Matthew 24:37-39 says, "But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.  For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."  These verses appear to corroborate the Kali Yuga being connected to Noah's flood (3102 BC)--or rather the other way around--the Kali Yuga (iron age of evil with the days of iron mixing somewhat with clay at the end) began with the local flood of Noah. 

 

You see it is said that the Kali Yuga would last some 5,000 years.  It is now some 5,000 years later and we are in the last of the last days--when we will see the consummation of all things: the coming of the Antichrist and then the coming of Jesus Christ to punish the workers of iniquity (who are led by the sons of Satan: Synagogue of Satan: Kenite families such as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers (and all their henchmen who are posing as Christians, which includes quite a few Israelites)).  And then will begin a new golden age--the thousand years--under Jesus.

Mahabharata War Took Place in 5561 BC

 

Dr. Glen Milne of Durham University did a computer projection of what the coastline of Northwest India was like thousands of years ago.  His computer model showed that around 7,700 years ago Dwarka was an island.  If memory serves Dwarka was inundated four times over thousands of years--and each time it was rebuilt further eastward (as the sea level continued to rise).  And if memory serves one of those floods that swept over Dwarka happened about 36 years after the Mahabharat War. 

 

If this war occurred in 5561 BC (the Heroic Age of Vedic India), then Dwarka sank in 5525 BC--as Mahabharat scholar Nilesh Nilkanth Oak says.  Milne's computer model shows Dwarka being submerged around 5300 BC.  That's a difference of 225 years.  Why the discrepancy?

 

Perhaps with computer modeling for coastline changes that occurred millennia ago, we should allow for a margin of error that encompasses a few hundred years.  Graham Hancock did comment--after watching Milne's computer modeling of the changing coastline--that within a window of 800 years (from 7,700 to 6,900 ago) the Northwest coast of India saw a major change--in terms of the encroaching seawater.  But then we should remember that it was a sudden wave action that overran Dwarka in 5525 BC; it was not gradual in this case.

 

And so this Aryan (more likely Proto-Aryan) civilization came to an end.  And then in 4004 BC Yahveh Elohim put Adam and Eve in the garden in Eden (to the west in Sumeria).  And another Aryan civilization would rise.  (I just recently read somewhere that the garden event may go back further than 4004 BC--that is back to around 5500 BC.  If this is the case then the forming of Adam and Eve came right on the heels of the eighteen day Mahabharat war in 5561 BC.  Hmmm.  Seems plausible.  Also I just realized that 4004 BC would not be early enough for the appearance of Adam and Eve in the garden: that is if Noah's flood did occur in 3102 BC--the commencement of the Kali Yuga.)

 

Quickly, I would say that Noah's flood (north of India) happened around 3102 BC, which is the date that some say the Kali Yuga that we're in began.  After the local flood the Aryans--Noah's descendants--came into Northwest India and founded a successor Aryan civilization along the Sarasvati River.  Then about 3000 BC the Sarasvati dried up to such an extent that it no longer ran to the sea.  It must be around this time that these Aryans began the migration westward--to eventually become the Akkadian/Aryans who built a city called Babel in the plain of Shinar. 

 

Perhaps Nimrod or Sargon the Great ruled over the Akkadians around 2800 BC.  Then Hammurabi ruled in Babylon around 2400 BC.  More to come later, God willing.

et-haadam (Eth Ha Adam)/Lemurians/Aryans

The Adam spoken of in Genesis 1:27 is the same as the Adam spoken of in Genesis 2:7--that is "et-haadam."  Et or eth is the particle (in Hebrew) and is not easily translated into the English.  Ha is the article.  So et-haadam means something like this: "this self-same man (who is ruddy in appearance)." 

What we have here is that the Adam was first formed (for a living soul or being) in Genesis 1:27, which was likely many thousands of years ago.  And something happened and God formed another flesh body for this living soul--in the garden in Eden this time (Genesis 2:7).

The garden event most likely happened around 4004 BC.  So the appearance of the same Adam earlier (Gen. 1:27) must have occurred thousands of years earlier.  What we are seeing in this is that God's relationship with this Adam (a White Man) is going through two phases.

It may be that the Proto-Aryans--called Lemurians--were the children of the first advent of this Adam.  And he (the first time) was placed on the island of Hyperborea in the Northern Atlantic, which would explain why Hyperborea has come to be seen as a type (antitype) of the later garden of Eden.  The civilization founded by Adam--spanning much of East Asia and the Pacific Ocean--has been called "Lemuria."  It lasted thousands of years and may have finally come to an end with the Mahabharata War (circa 5561 BC according to Nilesh Nilkanth Oak).  This was a devastating war in which atomic weapons were employed.  Not long after that (5525 BC) Dwarka--city of Krishna--was flooded.  So pretty much this civilization came to an end.

Thus God (YHVH Elohim--the "YHVH," meaning "the Existing One," emphasizing that he would form a covenant(s) with Adam and his descendants.) formed (Hebrew verb "yatsar") this Adam in the garden in Eden (about 4004 BC).  And thus a new era for the Adamic (White) or Aryan race.

(Then it may be said that the Mahabharat War occurred before the war between the two seedlines (the seed of the woman (Jesus Christ) and the seed of the serpent (Satan)) commenced--as spoken of in Genesis 3:15.  Then the violence and genetic corruption (from the Nephilim, children of fallen angels and Sethite women) that happened in Genesis 6 came later ( the 3000s BC).)

 

First the Daniel 8 War

Satan will arrive on the earth, and he will take Jerusalem for a short while.  Daniel 11:38 says that he will "honour the God of forces" (KJV).  It appears that in the original Hebrew (Masoretic Text) it says that he will honor a deity that is a defence against Jesus Christ--that stands up against the Father and his Son.  Thus it is saying that he will attempt to be as the most High (Isaiah 14); "...yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him." (Daniel 11:45)

Before this happens the Daniel 8 War must take place: in which the USA and the State of Israel will attack Iran.  This Zionist endeavor will create such chaos and havoc--in which the USA loses its status as the superpower of the world (being the sacrifice (the phoenix that is burned up) that will usher in the kingdom or malkuth of the Antichrist)--that the "man of sin" will be presented as the savior of the world, promising peace.  He will say that he is Jesus Christ, and many will bow down to him, taking his "mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads..." (Revelation 13:16)  Yet by this deceptive peace he will ruin/destroy many.

By the way, the Synagogue of Satan (SoS) have inflicted cancer on the Israel nations--part of God's judgment on Israel for having fallen away from the truth (for the most part).  The SoS have perpetrated the contamination of the food supply with their genetically modified (Genetically Modified Organisms) seeds, which have spread everywhere.  These things have weakened people everywhere, it seems.  This way the masses will have been softened up enough to see the mark of the beast as an attractive thing.  Those who accept the mark will experience the "seven golden vials full of the wrath of God."  (Revelation 15:7) 

The First Jesus to Arrive=Satan

 

It is Satan ("man of sin")--called the "king of the north" in Daniel 11 and "Gog" in Ezekiel 38-39--who will lead the NATO forces ("God of forces") against the remnant of Judah in Palestine (taking Jerusalem briefly) and later invading North America (the regathering of Manasseh). 

 

It is said that the Bush family goes by the codename of "Gog."  And this land (USA controlled by Babylon: Federal Government) then can be known as "Magog."  Magog originally referred to Southern Russia--where ancient Khazaria once existed.  Khazaria was destroyed by the young Russian nation.  These Khazars were converts to Judaism (Talmudic).  The Khazar survivors fled into Eastern Europe, becoming the Ashkenazi Jews.  The Bush family is of Ashkenazi origin.  They are part of the Synagogue of Satan (Revelation 2:9 and 3:9).  They can also be traced back to the Kenites living in Canaan at the time of Abraham and his household (who were habiru: migrants).  These Kenites were/are the sons of Cain, son of Satan (the serpent in the garden (Genesis 3)).   

 

Their servants are pastors and Bible teachers--such as the Vigilant Christian, Dave Dionisi, Chris White, Kieth Truth, Forerunner777, Nephali 1981 (on Youtube), Billy Graham, Chuck Missler, Dr. Stan Montieth, Southwest Radio Ministries, TD Jakes, Joyce Meyers, Paula White, John Hagee, and (chances are) your pastor (if you attend a church on Sunday).  Those named are just some of the false teachers.  These are the tares, as Matthew 13:37-43 says: "...He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.  As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.  The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.  Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear."   

Dr. Killstare

 

The guy in the glasses above is Dr. Killstare.  He's a benefactor to our three super heroes.  Anyway, Chance and Queeny Cameron continue to do brilliant work on Youtube.  A number of us have learned quite a bit from Chance's teachings.  Their Youtube channels are: KeefTwoof and QueenyCameronForever, respectively.  Another person doing fantastic work (of late) is Mike Lovern, and that is also the name of his channel on Youtube.  

 

Lastly this is why I lean towards the sun being a dimensional portal, through which light comes: "And God said, Let there be light: and there was light." (Genesis 1:3)

Luke=Lucifer

Genesis 6: Time of the Mahabharata

House of Israel vs. House of Judah III

Esoteric History: Aryans/Adamites/Sethites

It appears that the Aryans were actually Adamites (who were Caucasian in appearance).  These Aryans lived in Western China (Tarim Basin).  You see Adam and Eve were driven from the Garden to the east--the Tarim Basin or Xinjiang.  They built magnificent cities and overall were a sophisticated people.  It was these Aryans that gifted a higher level of civilization to the Chinese.  It was also these Aryans (Whites) who established a proto-Hinduism in Northern India (the Rama Empire).  (Cain may have a bit later added his own twist to Hinduism with the Hindu trinity: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva.)

According to this very plausible theory Noah's flood would have occurred around 3800 BC.  (Couldn't it have occurred earlier?--say around 5500 BC?)  You see, I'm trying to reconcile the flood that created the Black Sea further west with this flood that took place in the Tarim Basin. 

Now before this regional flood in the Tarim Basin (Noah's flood) it had to be these White Adamites/Aryans who are the players in the great Aryan epics, such as the Mahabharata.  It may very well be that that story is about a family feud--between the House of Seth and the House of Cain--or a conflict between two families within the Sethite line.  Thus the Bhagavad Gita is a spiritual treatise that was the work of the Aryans.  It is my opinion that the happenings in Genesis 6 are elaborated upon in the Mahabharata.  (In the pre-flood world of the Mahabharata high technology was in use: space/aircraft that resemble the UFOs (flying saucers) and speculative fiction spaceships found in comics and movies.)  This means that this epic is older than 3800 BC.  5500 BC perhaps?  If this date for the Mahabharata war is accurate--and if we are to believe that Nibiru/Planet X/Nemesis is true--then said war occurred sometime after said planet (actually Nibiru is the sun's partner star that has its own planet(s)) came into our solar system.  Hmmm. 

What I'm wondering about is this thing about Rama having been an avatar of Vishnu--and Krishna later being an avatar of Vishnu also.  Could it be that Satan was trying to counterfeit the three manifestations of God?: the Father, the Son (being the image of the Father), and the Holy Spirit (the infinite mind of God--omnipresent and omniscient).  Satan, through Cain, coming up with the Hindu trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva?

If you consider the name "Abraham," you can see how it is reminscent of Abraham's lineage going back to Northern India and the Tarim Basin.  "Abraham" is similar to "Brahma."  The Aryans were the Brahmin--scholars bringing enlightenment--to India.

Then it can be said that the Aryans, after Noah's flood, went westward and took over the already present Sumerian civilization (becoming known as the Akkadians).  These Aryans, descended from Noah's family, were starting over again as far as civilization was concerned.  It may very well be that by Noah's time (before the flood) the Sethites had declined in terms of their technology.  They no longer possessed advanced aircraft; they were getting around in horse-drawn chariots and wagons.  Most likely the coming of Nibiru (about 3100 BC) caused such destruction that civilization collapsed (once more). 

Earlier the Kenites (Sons of Cain) also came along from Nod (to the east) to influence the Sumerians. We are told of seven sages (Abgal) coming into Sumer from the east.  These Abgal were created by Enki (anagram for Cain).  Oannes was the leader of the Abgal.  He was supposed to have been a fish god--Dagon being another name for him.  "Oannes" is another way of saying Enoch (son of Cain).  The fish meme may be symbolic of how the Kenites (Cain and his son Enoch) were not overtaken by the flood.  Manu, the Vedic corruption of Noah, was aided by a fish when a flood came upon Northern India.  This could be speaking of Naamah--daughter of Lamech (a son of Cain)-- who may very well have been Ham's wife.  (Ham appears to have had a tendency to perversion.  Not only did he marry a Kenite woman, but he uncovered his father's nakedness--had sex with his father's wife--the offspring of said union was Canaan.)  Therefore part of the Kenite line went through the flood by way of Naamah marrying Ham.

Thus the Aryans brought enlightenment to Mesopotamia and Egypt.  They may have been adding on to earlier contributions by the Atlanteans.  The Aryans (children of Shem, Ham, and Japheth) would raise the level of civilization to its highest levels--bringing about its greatest achievements.  These Aryans being the descendants of the last of the Anunnaki: Adam and Eve.

Plato pointed out that civilization is cyclical: it rises and it falls and it rises again.  It could be that the flood of 5500 BC that devastated the area of the Black Sea (and by extension Sumeria)--turning that lake into a sea that is connected to the Mediterranean--left the region in a pitiable state as far as culture and the other trappings of civilization are concerned.  And about 3150 BC a bolide (comet or asteroid) struck the Mediterranean, leaving much devastation (similar to the comet that exploded over Ireland in 562 AD, which severely affected much of the Europe's weather for at least a decade).  Then the Aryans (descendants of Noah) came along and raised it back up again--and even to a higher state of accomplishment.  It may be that the peoples in the Mediterranean and the Middle East at this time were the children of Adamites who had migrated from the Tarim Basin before the flood of Noah.

 

Romance in the Apocalypse

 

 

 

 

As the Apocalypse Unfolds...

House of Israel vs. House of Judah 2 (In the Twentieth Century)

When the House of Israel Fought the House of Judah

The Sun: A Dimensional Portal?

 

Mr. Dollard says that the sun is actually a dimensional portal.  It is not a nuclear reactor.  The energy it emits comes from another dimension.  I have to agree with him on this. 

Doing Art During the Apocalypse

Apocalyptic! 2

Apocalyptic!

 

The Story Continues (1/29/13)

The Story Continues (1/13/13)